> From: Keith Moore <moore(_at_)network-heretics(_dot_)com>
> You don't need to add it to all (or most) IPv6 implementations.
More hair-splitting...
> The goal ... is not to magically make all boxes and apps suddenly be
> able to communicate with both IPv4-only and IPv6-only hosts as if there
> were no difference between the two.
So you're willing to live with the converse of that? I.e. a situation where
communication between the two groups is spotty and unpredictable?
> Enterprise network management will continue to evolve and they'll see
> the benefits of using v6.
A familiar prediction...
>> Either this functionality is added to .. IPv6 .., or the IPv6/v4
>> NAT boxes .. will display the same crippling problems as v4/v4 NAT...
> No, because (a) you're not trying to impose this on all hosts or apps,
> ... and (c) you engineer these boxes from day one in such a way as to
> avoid the crippling problems we've experience in v4 NAT.
I see no refutation of my basic observation, here.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf