Oops, used wrong from address
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bert Wijnen" hfam(_dot_)wijnen(_at_)xxxx
To: "Pete Resnick" <presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: <iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
Pete,
I am not sure how this helps.
I thought that ID authors/editors DO know what MUST/SHOULD means.
If not, then as far as I am concerned, we can change the capitalized words
into lower case. The front of the document shows (into with notes) clearly
waht the intent is. And is states that ADs will not accept a request
for publication and will not put it on the IESG agenda.
Is that not clear enough?
See also my response to Klensin and Crocker about the intent of the
document.
That said, if Russ agrees, I can certainly add more boilerplate text as
you suggest below. I doubt it will make the document any more useful.
Bert
Editor of ID_Checklist
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Resnick" <presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Cc: "IETF Chair" <chair(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; "IETF Announcement
list" <ietf-announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; <iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-ChecklistOn 7/8/08 at 11:44
AM -0700, IETF Chair wrote:
The IESG solicits comments on this proposed update. The IESG plans
to make a decision on this proposed text on 2008-07-17. Please send
substantive comments to the ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by
2008-07-16. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject
line to allow automated sorting.
Insert in the Introduction, before or at the beginning of "Notes:"
-----
This memo uses the terms "MUST", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", and
"RECOMMENDED", similarly to the use of these terms in RFC 2119. In
particular, when they appear in ALL CAPS in this memo:
-"MUST" or "REQUIRED" means that if you do not do this in your I-D,
the IESG will not accept the I-D for any review until the item is
complete.
- "SHOULD" or "RECOMMENDED" means that there may be valid reasons
to ignore the item, but an explanation must be given, either in the
text of the document or as part of the submission to the IESG, as to
why the item is being ignored. Otherwise, the IESG may not accept the
I-D for review.
-----
This text both (a) puts draft authors on notice as to what the hard
requirements are in order to avoid late surprises, and (b) puts
reviewers of this memo on notice so that consensus can be reached on
what are or are not real showstoppers for IESG review.
pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf