ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"

2008-08-13 06:25:05
Scott Kitterman <scott(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> writes:

My suggestion is adopt a rule that code snippets in any RFC MUST include a 
comment to the effect that "This code was derived from IETF RFC XXXX".  If 
it's in the code snipppet as a comment to copy/paste virtually everyone will 
copy/paste it.  I suspect that those that wouldn't aren't likely to be 
significantly deterred by a license statement.

Once it's a documented requirement and it's on the ID nits checklist, I 
suspect that solves 99% of the problem with no license incompatibility risk.

Adding a comment like that seems like a good idea, and having it on the
ID nits checklist seems equally useful.  So +1.  However I don't see any
point in the MUST here.

/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf