--On Wednesday, 27 August, 2008 02:32 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Russ Housley wrote:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc97.pdf
Yes, that was a famous case for friends of RFC 5198 :-)
I think somebody had a printed copy and scanned it to
fill a gap in the repository at least for PDF.
Now looking at it again, the last page was apparently
never ASCII. Or it does not really belong to RFC 97.
Many of the very early RFCs were prepared in NLS... or on what I
believe were called "typewriters" at the time. Neither form is
conveniently machine-processable today.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf