-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:48:07 -0700
Joe Touch <touch(_at_)ISI(_dot_)EDU> wrote:
The point I'm making is that there seems like there should be a way to
prevent the covert channel without mucking up TCP's definition of what
an endpoint is.
I think this belongs elsewhere than either the secdir list or the main
IETF list,
Agreed; I propose to take this over to TSVWG. It's more general than
just TCP...
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkjlcSsACgkQE5f5cImnZrtQJgCfVlcoaA/2rMVhxwWGq5EPDfbP
1F4An25RwJZZRHqcvsUcmzI4CrXG5fQW
=4qBz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf