On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:11:07 -0700
Joe Touch <touch(_at_)ISI(_dot_)EDU> wrote:
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:48:07 -0700
Joe Touch <touch(_at_)ISI(_dot_)EDU> wrote:
The point I'm making is that there seems like there should be a
way to prevent the covert channel without mucking up TCP's
definition of what an endpoint is.
I think this belongs elsewhere than either the secdir list or the
main IETF list,
Agreed; I propose to take this over to TSVWG. It's more general than
just TCP...
Don't forget to include SAAG...
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf