-----Original Message-----
From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:32 PM
To: Narayanan, Vidya
Cc: p2pi(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic
Optimization (alto)
Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
With respect to process, I think this one takes the cake among
abominations. Having been at the IETF long enough and having
participated in several BoFs, I'm quite familiar with
RFC2418 and the
process. Here we have an effort that started with a closed/gated
workshop outside the IETF,
Actually, this is not so. The workshop *was* sponsored by
IETF; the RAI area, to be more precise (please see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg
04758.html).
My point is that this was a closed effort - it was not a meeting that was open
to all for attendence. The fact that the RAI ADs decided to do this doesn't
automatically make it "IETF sponsored". Not to mention that the topics covered
by this workshop or the scope of it was not really open to discussion at the
IETF. All of this makes it sqauarely an effort outside the IETF and let's not
try to pretend it was somehow as open as other IETF efforts.
But, let's get past that itself and focus on how to make the best of the effort
going forward.
Regards,
Vidya
The initial notes from the workshop are also archived at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2pi/current/msg00025.html.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960
Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg(_at_){alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf