Randy Presuhn wrote:
"Informational" makes sense to me at this time.
Why?
What are the specific aspects of this specification that fail to qualify for
Proposed Standard?
What changes to the specification will fix these deficiencies?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf