IETF Discussion (date)
November 30, 2008
- Re: The internet architecture, John Day, 22:42
- Re: The internet architecture, Dave CROCKER, 22:07
- Re: The internet architecture, Dave CROCKER, 21:44
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt, Colin Perkins, 20:52
- Re: The internet architecture, Keith Moore, 11:31
- Re: The internet architecture, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:53
- Re: The internet architecture, Noel Chiappa, 10:12
November 29, 2008
- Re: The internet architecture, Keith Moore, 23:27
- Re: The internet architecture, Marc Manthey, 18:13
- Re: The internet architecture, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 16:58
- Re: Friday experiment, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:11
- Re: Friday experiment, Julian Reschke, 07:16
- Re: Friday experiment, Joel Jaeggli, 06:28
November 28, 2008
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, John C Klensin, 21:19
- Re: Friday experiment, Michael Richardson, 20:42
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, Tim Bray, 18:36
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, Theodore Tso, 18:12
- RE: Advice on publishing open standards, michael.dillon, 16:50
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Paul Wouters, 16:48
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, AJ Jaghori, 16:47
- Re: Friday experiment, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:44
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, Tony Hansen, 16:39
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, slevin, 16:22
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Mark Andrews, 16:21
- Re: Friday experiment, John C Klensin, 16:19
- Re: Friday experiment, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:12
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, slevin, 16:11
- Re: Friday experiment, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:06
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, slevin, 15:58
- Re: Friday experiment, Ole Jacobsen, 15:38
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, Doug Ewell, 15:37
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers, Keith Moore, 15:34
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impactto applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:27
- Re: Friday experiment, Joel Jaeggli, 15:13
- Re: Friday experiment, Joel Jaeggli, 15:09
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:07
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, Brian E Carpenter, 15:05
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:55
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Paul Wouters, 14:39
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, slevin, 14:28
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, John C Klensin, 14:20
- Re: Advice on publishing open standards, Randy Presuhn, 14:01
- Advice on publishing open standards, slevin, 13:50
- Re: Friday experiment, John C Klensin, 13:45
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, John C Klensin, 13:45
- Gen-ART & Transport Area review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-26.txt, Black_David, 13:44
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Steve Crocker, 13:43
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Andrew Sullivan, 12:28
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Bill Manning, 11:58
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Andrew Sullivan, 10:59
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, John C Klensin, 10:09
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Matthew Ford, 09:29
- Re: Friday experiment, Lars Eggert, 06:12
- Re: Friday experiment, Stewart Bryant, 05:50
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Stig Venaas, 05:48
- Friday experiment, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:41
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Bill Manning, 04:49
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:46
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:45
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 00:53
November 27, 2008
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Lucy Lynch, 16:18
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Dave CROCKER, 16:13
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Steve Crocker, 15:53
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Olaf Kolkman, 15:21
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Matthew Ford, 14:49
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Paul Wouters, 14:48
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Paul Wouters, 14:45
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, David Conrad, 14:36
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Michael Richardson, 14:22
- Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... Was Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers, Cullen Jennings, 13:51
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Dave CROCKER, 13:04
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Peter Koch, 12:35
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Eric Klein, 12:34
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Eric Klein, 12:33
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Eric Klein, 12:33
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Margaret Wasserman, 12:32
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, ned+ietf, 12:31
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Michael Richardson, 12:30
- Review of draft-ietf-trill-prob-05, Bernard Aboba, 12:29
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt, Ryuji Wakikawa, 12:28
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:40
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Keith Moore, 02:20
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 02:01
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Joel M. Halpern, 00:28
November 26, 2008
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, TJ, 23:51
- New boilerplate (was: Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm-00), Doug Ewell, 20:24
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Ted Hardie, 19:36
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Mark Andrews, 18:22
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Tony Hain, 18:18
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, David Conrad, 18:14
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Mark Andrews, 18:09
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, David Morris, 18:02
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Mark Andrews, 17:41
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Ron Bonica, 17:09
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Keith Moore, 15:39
- Re: secdir review of draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06, Brian E Carpenter, 15:16
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Bill Manning, 14:22
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Margaret Wasserman, 14:14
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Randy Presuhn, 14:06
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-03, Adrian Farrel, 13:39
- Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, John C Klensin, 13:05
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact toapplicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:01
- Re: secdir review of draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06, Russ Housley, 12:57
- Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74, Russ Housley, 12:50
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, ned+ietf, 12:43
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:39
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Margaret Wasserman, 12:28
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:27
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:15
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:00
- RE: Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:59
- secdir review of draft-raj-dhc-tftp-addr-option-04, Samuel Weiler, 11:58
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, james woodyatt, 11:57
- secdir review of draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06, Samuel Weiler, 11:57
- The internet architecture, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:45
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Magnus Westerlund, 10:21
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-03, Ben Campbell, 09:56
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm-00, Ben Campbell, 09:51
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Noel Chiappa, 09:03
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to applicationdevelopers, michael.dillon, 04:27
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 04:11
November 25, 2008
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 21:37
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, David Conrad, 21:08
- Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP)) to Proposed Standard, Douglas Otis, 20:14
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 19:50
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 19:49
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Tony Hain, 19:43
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 18:59
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-03, Ben Campbell, 18:29
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, David Conrad, 18:23
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Sam Hartman, 18:12
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Peter Dambier, 18:10
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 17:44
- RE: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Tony Hain, 17:19
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, David Morris, 16:26
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Keith Moore, 15:25
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt, Elwyn Davies, 12:47
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Marc Manthey, 09:56
- SECDIR review of draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-09, Richard Barnes, 00:23
November 24, 2008
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt, Jari Arkko, 22:53
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt, Elwyn Davies, 20:42
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Peter Dambier, 17:26
- Re: Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Patrik Fältström, 13:12
- Re: Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Marc Manthey, 12:17
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Eric Klein, 12:11
- Re: Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Fred Baker, 12:10
- Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Margaret Wasserman, 08:47
- Re: What basis we have to construct NHAF for IBGP and EBGP?, Venkateshwaran R, 06:17
November 21, 2008
- Please clarify how do we trigger KeepAliveTimer_Expires event in OPENSENT state., Venkateshwaran R, 23:14
- What basis we have to construct NHAF for IBGP and EBGP?, Venkateshwaran R, 23:09
- Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers, Tony Hain, 22:39
- Re: Last Call sender-auth-header, Douglas Otis, 20:43
- Re: Last Call sender-auth-header, SM, 14:10
- [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework (A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Policies) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Allen, 12:29
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt, Black_David, 12:28
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-cosfield-def ("EXP field" renamed to "Traffic Class field") to Proposed Standard, Venkat Doddaballapur (dvenkata), 12:27
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Phillip Hallam-baker, 12:26
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Marshall Eubanks, 08:14
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Marshall Eubanks, 07:53
- draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject approved by IESG, Matthew Elvey, 04:29
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Raj Yaralagadda, 02:11
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Marc Manthey, 01:12
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Adrian Farrel, 00:57
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 00:53
November 19, 2008
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Dan York, 19:05
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Keith Moore, 18:59
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Marc Manthey, 18:52
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Brian E Carpenter, 18:43
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Marc Manthey, 18:30
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Jari Arkko, 18:25
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Marshall Eubanks, 18:14
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Marc Manthey, 18:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Chris Newman, 18:04
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Dave CROCKER, 18:03
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Stephane H Maes, 17:48
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Marshall Eubanks, 17:48
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Daniel Brown, 17:33
- RE: Plenary Online Experiment, Stephane H Maes, 17:29
- Re: Plenary Online Experiment, Marc Manthey, 15:55
- Plenary Online Experiment, IETF Chair, 15:50
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, David Morris, 15:21
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Ole Jacobsen, 14:36
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 14:22
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Dave CROCKER, 14:19
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Adrian Farrel, 14:11
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Fred Baker, 12:56
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Fred Baker, 12:55
- RE: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Fleischman, Eric, 12:54
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Fred Baker, 12:53
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, David Quigley, 12:52
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, james woodyatt, 12:51
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Scott Brim, 12:50
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, YAO Jiankang, 12:49
- RE: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\), 12:49
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Nicholas Weaver, 12:48
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Randy Bush, 12:47
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Yi Zhao, 12:46
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Yi Zhao, 12:45
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Nicholas Weaver, 12:44
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Randy Bush, 12:43
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:42
- Re: [73all] Google, Open Source & Android, Dave CROCKER, 09:52
- Re: [73all] Google, Open Source & Android, lars.eggert, 09:40
- Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Tom.Petch, 07:33
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Tom.Petch, 07:32
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Fernando Gont, 04:05
November 18, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland, 22:31
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, James Seng, 18:49
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Livingood, Jason, 16:57
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Matthew Ford, 16:54
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Gene Gaines, 15:52
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo), 15:34
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Joel Jaeggli, 15:10
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Dave CROCKER, 15:05
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Randy Presuhn, 14:47
- Re: Minneapolis IETF Code Sprint, IETF Chair, 14:42
- Re: several messages, Tom.Petch, 14:36
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Melinda Shore, 14:23
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Marc Manthey, 12:57
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Ed Jankiewicz, 12:49
- Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Bruce Lowekamp, 12:49
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Randy Bush, 12:48
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Patrik Fältström, 12:47
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, qdang, 12:46
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt, Ryuji Wakikawa, 12:45
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Ross Callon, 12:44
- Re:[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, 张国强, 12:43
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Song Haibin, 12:42
- Review of draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt, Bernard Aboba, 12:41
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, Eric Gray, 11:41
- update on draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl, Aaron Falk, 11:15
- Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?, YAO, 01:25
November 17, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-blinds (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 12:53
- RE: [Sipping] Names of People Encoded On RFID Cards, DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\), 12:34
- Re: [Tsvwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-admitted-realtime-dscp (DSCP for Capacity-Admitted Traffic) to Proposed Standard, Fred Baker, 12:33
- Re: [Tsvwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-admitted-realtime-dscp (DSCP for Capacity-Admitted Traffic) to Proposed Standard, Bob Briscoe, 12:32
- Re: several messages, Rich Kulawiec, 12:31
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Darrel Lewis (darlewis), 12:30
- Re: Audio Streaming - IETF 73 November 16-21, 2008, Joel Jaeggli, 10:13
November 16, 2008
- Audio Streaming - IETF 73 November 16-21, 2008, Joel Jaeggli, 23:11
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Mark Andrews, 22:14
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Mark Andrews, 22:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 20:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Florian Weimer, 17:00
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Florian Weimer, 16:53
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 16:46
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Florian Weimer, 16:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 16:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Florian Weimer, 14:29
- Names of People Encoded On RFID Cards, Athar Shiraz Siddiqui, 14:19
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Mark Andrews, 13:42
- IANA "Office Hours" at IETF-73 in Minneapolis, Michelle Cotton, 12:55
- Re: more bad ideas, was uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Keith Moore, 12:32
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Henning Schulzrinne, 11:14
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 08:40
November 15, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Mark Townsley, 23:45
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 21:03
- Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 20:44
- 2nd Call for IAOC Nominations and Volunteers, IAB Chair, 13:01
- Re: several messages, Pekka Savola, 08:04
- Re: Detecting and disabling bad DNSBLs, Steve Linford, 04:00
- Detecting and disabling bad DNSBLs, Peter Dambier, 03:39
November 14, 2008
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John L, 20:45
- Re: more bad ideas, was uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Chris Lewis, 20:12
- Re: more bad ideas, was uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John Levine, 20:05
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Chris Lewis, 19:25
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Theodore Tso, 19:20
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Theodore Tso, 19:04
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Florian Weimer, 18:54
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Douglas Otis, 16:53
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 16:41
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Al Iverson, 16:09
- RE: several messages, michael.dillon, 15:12
- Re: several messages, Al Iverson, 15:11
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Keith Moore, 15:03
- Re: several messages, Chris Lewis, 14:56
- Re: several messages, John C Klensin, 14:50
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), michael.dillon, 14:12
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Al Iverson, 14:04
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), michael.dillon, 14:00
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John L, 13:56
- Re: several messages, Al Iverson, 13:51
- Re: several messages, John C Klensin, 13:46
- Re: Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?, Henning Schulzrinne, 13:35
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 13:10
- Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, SM, 12:54
- Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Keith Moore, 12:51
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 12:50
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 12:43
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Keith Moore, 12:42
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Al Iverson, 12:31
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, michael.dillon, 12:14
- adm plea: avoid/reduce massive cross-posting? (was: Can we have on NAT66 discussion?), Lixia Zhang, 12:00
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:50
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Margaret Wasserman, 11:47
- FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:43
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Eric Klein, 11:38
- RE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Song Haibin, 11:37
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Rich Kulawiec, 11:36
- Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Bruce Lowekamp, 11:35
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Darrel Lewis (darlewis), 11:34
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Eric Klein, 11:33
- Re: several messages, Rich Kulawiec, 11:32
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Tony Finch, 11:18
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Hardie, Ted, 10:46
- Re: Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?, Andrew G. Malis, 10:37
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 09:53
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Aaron Stone, 09:36
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John Levine, 08:06
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Tony Finch, 07:12
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), michael.dillon, 05:49
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Steve Linford, 04:55
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 03:58
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), michael.dillon, 03:19
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Rémi Denis-Courmont, 02:59
- Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 02:57
- Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 02:42
- Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Pekka Savola, 02:36
- Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 02:13
- Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Pekka Savola, 01:14
November 13, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Doug Otis, 23:07
- Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?, Athar Shiraz Siddiqui, 22:40
- secdir review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd, Kurt Zeilenga, 20:57
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Chris Lewis, 20:37
- comments on draft-ietf-p2psip-base-00 re enrollment, Das, Saumitra, 18:44
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Russ Housley, 18:40
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Keith Moore, 18:16
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Keith Moore, 18:06
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:50
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Peter Dambier, 17:42
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, David Romerstein, 17:41
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:40
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Keith Moore, 17:35
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Peter Dambier, 17:29
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd-05, Ben Campbell, 17:18
- Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 17:09
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, wasseveral messages, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:06
- TSV Area review of draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters, Scott O. Bradner, 16:44
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:37
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:35
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages), Steve Linford, 16:31
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:30
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:16
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 16:01
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Chris Lewis, 15:52
- Clarifying harm to DNS (was: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages_, Andrew Sullivan, 15:22
- Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 15:08
- Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Colin Perkins, 14:34
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Tony Finch, 14:23
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 14:19
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Matthias Leisi, 14:04
- RE: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power, Das, Saumitra, 13:57
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Ted Hardie, 13:51
- RE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Das, Saumitra, 13:47
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John C Klensin, 13:40
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Andrew Sullivan, 13:39
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Al Iverson, 13:34
- RE: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power, Das, Saumitra, 13:33
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Matthias Leisi, 13:26
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John C Klensin, 13:16
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Andrew Sullivan, 13:09
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Tony Finch, 13:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, John C Klensin, 13:01
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Dave CROCKER, 12:58
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John C Klensin, 12:55
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Chris Lewis, 12:54
- Re: several messages, Chris Lewis, 12:44
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Jim Hill, 12:43
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Russ Housley, 12:42
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, David Romerstein, 12:09
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Scott Brim, 11:52
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Andrew Sullivan, 11:39
- Re: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power, Bruce Lowekamp, 11:35
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Eric Klein, 11:34
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats - limitations of 6to4, Rémi Després, 11:33
- RE: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power, Song Haibin, 11:32
- RE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Song Haibin, 11:31
- Re: several messages, der Mouse, 11:30
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Dave CROCKER, 11:18
- RE: several messages, Anthony Purcell, 10:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, SM, 10:43
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Al Iverson, 10:41
- RE: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl(DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:16
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:14
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Matthias Leisi, 10:08
- RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:06
- RE: several messages, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:47
- Re: several messages, Al Iverson, 09:43
- RE: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power, Roni Even, 09:37
- RE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Roni Even, 09:27
- Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?, Mark Townsley, 09:11
- Re: several messages, John C Klensin, 08:48
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, Jim Hill, 07:35
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Pekka Savola, 07:24
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats - limitations of 6to4, Pekka Savola, 07:18
- SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Tony Finch, 06:50
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages, John Levine, 06:23
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl(DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 02:43
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), David Kessens, 00:38
- Re: several messages, David Morris, 00:02
November 12, 2008
- Re: several messages, Al Iverson, 23:47
- Re: several messages, David Morris, 23:37
- Re: several messages, Al Iverson, 23:26
- Re: several messages, David Morris, 23:09
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 22:05
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), Danny McPherson, 20:12
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Dave CROCKER, 20:02
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 19:34
- Re: several messages, Mark Andrews, 19:11
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, John C Klensin, 17:06
- Re: several messages, Matthias Leisi, 16:55
- Re: not spoofing, was IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL, John Levine, 16:35
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), David Kessens, 16:29
- RE: several messages, michael.dillon, 16:07
- RE: IPv6 traffic stats, TJ, 16:03
- More anti-spam (was: Re: several messages), John C Klensin, 16:01
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), David Kessens, 15:59
- Re: several messages, Chris Lewis, 15:55
- Re: several messages, Keith Moore, 15:44
- Re: several messages, David Romerstein, 15:41
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:26
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:23
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Danny McPherson, 15:18
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), Danny McPherson, 15:15
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Pekka Savola, 15:09
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Peter Sherbin, 14:56
- Re: several messages, David Romerstein, 14:43
- Re: several messages, Chris Lewis, 14:39
- Re: several messages, Randy Presuhn, 14:33
- Re: several messages, David Romerstein, 14:18
- Re: several messages, Randy Presuhn, 14:15
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Geoff Huston, 14:08
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Chris Lewis, 13:00
- RE: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for allnewSubmissions to IETF, Livingood, Jason, 12:59
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Tony Finch, 12:56
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 12:48
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Andrew Sullivan, 12:33
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 12:23
- Re: several messages, Chris Lewis, 12:12
- RE: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all newSubmissions to IETF, David B. Nelson, 11:49
- Missing materials, Eric Rescorla, 11:45
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt, Fernando Gont, 11:44
- Queries about SAE Beaer setup request while UE is in detach state., Bivudendu Rout, 11:43
- Re: several messages, der Mouse, 11:42
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Rich Kulawiec, 11:41
- Re: several messages, der Mouse, 11:40
- Anyone need a hotel room for Minneapolis?, Randall Gellens, 11:39
- Re: Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt, Alan DeKok, 11:38
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:31
- RE: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissions to IETF, Ed Juskevicius, 11:30
- RE: IPv6 traffic stats, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:26
- Re: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissions to IETF, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:17
- Re: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissions to IETF, Tim Chown, 10:13
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Harald Alvestrand, 05:07
- Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion, Das, Saumitra, 04:32
- Re: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power, Das, Saumitra, 04:13
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Eliot Lear, 01:05
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Pekka Savola, 00:55
November 11, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Andrew Sullivan, 22:00
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Dave CROCKER, 19:04
- RE: IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), Joe St Sauver, 18:11
- Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissions to IETF, Ed Juskevicius, 18:04
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Mark Andrews, 17:58
- Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Randy Presuhn, 17:57
- Re: several messages, Mark Andrews, 17:43
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), SM, 17:22
- Re: several messages, Chris Lewis, 17:18
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Marc Manthey, 17:06
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Chris Lewis, 16:48
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Harald Alvestrand, 16:35
- Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07, Jonathan Curtis, 15:50
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Turchanyi Geza, 15:49
- Re: IPv6 traffic stats, Harald Alvestrand, 15:38
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, linuxa linux, 15:32
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, linuxa linux, 15:20
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 15:18
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 15:06
- IPv6 traffic stats (was: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)), David Kessens, 13:59
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), TS Glassey, 13:42
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Eliot Lear, 13:35
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Matthias Leisi, 13:14
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Matthias Leisi, 13:10
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), TS Glassey, 12:55
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Keith Moore, 12:42
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Keith Moore, 12:36
- Audio Streaming - IETF 73 November 16-21, 2008, Joel Jaeggli, 12:24
- Re: several messages, der Mouse, 12:20
- Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, Rich Kulawiec, 12:19
- Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt, Glen Zorn, 12:18
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), der Mouse, 12:17
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Tony Finch, 12:16
- Re: What Sort Of Jabber Server For IETF Conference?, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:15
- Re: What Sort Of Jabber Server For IETF Conference?, Athar Shiraz Siddiqui, 12:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 11:41
- Re: What Sort Of Jabber Server For IETF Conference?, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Jamie Tomasello, 11:35
- What Sort Of Jabber Server For IETF Conference?, Athar Shiraz Siddiqui, 11:33
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Joe St Sauver, 11:27
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), TS Glassey, 11:17
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Sam Hartman, 11:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Lisa Dusseault, 11:00
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:57
- Re: several messages, Keith Moore, 10:44
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Dave CROCKER, 10:43
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Dave CROCKER, 10:41
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Dave CROCKER, 10:39
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Keith Moore, 10:34
- Re: several messages, Steve Linford, 10:27
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Eliot Lear, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Steve Linford, 09:56
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), michael.dillon, 09:55
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-07, Dave CROCKER, 09:51
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Theodore Tso, 09:39
- Re: several messages, Peter Dambier, 09:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tim Chown, 07:38
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Keith Moore, 06:18
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, Ruszlan Gaszanov, 04:36
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), michael.dillon, 04:24
- Re: several messages, Steve Linford, 04:13
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, linuxa linux, 04:10
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Eliot Lear, 03:18
- Re: several messages, Matthias Leisi, 01:29
November 10, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Dave Cridland, 23:32
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Lawrence Rosen, 19:17
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, linuxa linux, 18:16
- Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-07.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 17:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, SM, 17:00
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, SM, 16:58
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), John Levine, 16:38
- RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Lawrence Rosen, 16:06
- Gen-ART review of draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-07, Spencer Dawkins, 15:56
- Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), John Leslie, 15:38
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Stuart Cheshire, 14:32
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 14:04
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 13:47
- Re: IETF Trust Decision on "Legal Provisions for IETF Documents" (datedOctober 16, 2008), TS Glassey, 13:45
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 13:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 13:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 13:26
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 13:14
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 13:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), der Mouse, 13:02
- Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-lo-profile (GEOPRIV PIDF-LO Usage Clarification, Considerations and Recommendations) to Proposed Standard, creed, 13:01
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Finch, 12:26
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Steve Linford, 12:16
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Russ Housley, 11:20
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Russ Housley, 10:25
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Dave CROCKER, 10:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 10:19
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Livingood, Jason, 09:20
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 08:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 07:12
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Jari Arkko, 06:34
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04, Christian Vogt, 03:12
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04, Rémi Denis-Courmont, 03:04
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04, Christian Vogt, 02:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Matthias Leisi, 01:06
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 01:00
November 09, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Steven M. Bellovin, 23:51
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Tony Hansen, 23:41
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), michael.dillon, 17:22
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, Ruszlan Gaszanov, 17:22
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, Russ Housley, 17:11
- RE: Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, Ruszlan Gaszanov, 15:28
- Punycode at ASCII for IDN & MDN via Y2K Project Management, linuxa linux, 14:57
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 13:34
- IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long), Keith Moore, 13:29
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Matthias Leisi, 12:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 12:09
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 01:53
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 00:54
November 08, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 22:41
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Livingood, Jason, 20:58
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 20:24
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Livingood, Jason, 20:16
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John C Klensin, 20:06
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd (DNS-Based Service Discovery) to Informational RFC, Cullen Jennings, 19:57
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John C Klensin, 19:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John C Klensin, 19:47
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), David Conrad, 19:46
- Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, Chris Lewis, 19:32
- Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, John Levine, 19:10
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 19:07
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Theodore Tso, 18:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 18:21
- Re: draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, SM, 18:11
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 17:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 17:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 17:37
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Theodore Tso, 17:05
- draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, John Leslie, 17:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 16:44
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 16:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 16:17
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Doug Ewell, 15:47
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Paul Hoffman, 15:16
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 14:50
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 14:38
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 13:46
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Chris Lewis, 13:45
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 13:28
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John C Klensin, 12:54
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John C Klensin, 12:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Eric Rescorla, 12:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 12:32
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Steven M. Bellovin, 12:27
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 12:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 11:59
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Dave CROCKER, 11:54
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 11:40
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Eric Rescorla, 11:31
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Dave CROCKER, 10:54
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), ned+ietf, 10:33
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, SM, 09:28
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John C Klensin, 06:47
November 07, 2008
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP, John C Klensin, 23:59
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard, SM, 20:10
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 18:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Keith Moore, 18:29
- Re: The purpose of a Last Call, Leslie Daigle, 16:39
- Re: The purpose of a Last Call, Sam Hartman, 15:14
- Re: The purpose of a Last Call, Pete Resnick, 15:06
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Doug Otis, 15:03
- RE: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Livingood, Jason, 13:54
- The purpose of a Last Call, Dave CROCKER, 12:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 12:24
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard, John Levine, 12:14
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Sam Hartman, 12:11
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Dave CROCKER, 10:58
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 10:37
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John L, 10:23
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:53
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), John Levine, 09:19
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04, Rémi Denis-Courmont, 06:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:18
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04, Christian Vogt, 06:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard, SM, 01:49
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 00:53
November 03, 2008
- Re: Solutions to the IDN Problems Discussed, Joe Baptista, 18:56
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-06, Ben Campbell, 17:49
- Re: Solutions to the IDN Problems Discussed, Roger Jørgensen, 16:45
- Solutions to the IDN Problems Discussed, linuxa linux, 16:02
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-05, Mark Watson, 12:41
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework (Frameworkfor Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS) to ProposedStandard, Thierry Moreau, 11:27
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt, Stephen Nadas, 10:53
- Call for IAOC Nominations and Volunteers, IAB Chair, 04:22
November 02, 2008
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications, linuxa linux, 12:53
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications, Doug Ewell, 11:38
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specification, linuxa linux, 09:43
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specification, Joe Baptista, 09:09
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications, linuxa linux, 07:49