ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

2008-11-13 12:43:15
David Romerstein in
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)64(_dot_)0811130905170(_dot_)8743(_at_)toro(_dot_)popovich(_dot_)net>:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Jim Hill wrote:

That seems to satisfy all the requirements for removal listed at
<http://www.us.sorbs.net/faq/dul.shtml>

I believe that it's listed 'correctly', per that FAQ, for one reason:

[romer(_at_)toro mail]$ dig 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa
142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa. 86265 IN     CNAME   email.xpasc.com.

CNAME, not PTR. SORBS *appears* to want PTRs (with appropriate TTLs).

There is a delegated ptr-record ... 

| dig ptr 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa
| 
| ;; ANSWER SECTION:
| 142.17.85.65.in-addr.arpa. 59754 IN     CNAME   email.xpasc.com.
| email.xpasc.com.        59754   IN      PTR     email.xpasc.com.

The ttl seems to be ok as well (ignore the above from my cache).
-- 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf