Al Iverson wrote:
I think anonymous may be a bit better in this context, because
otherwise the conversation degenerates into an argument about some
particular DNSBL, instead of a discussion about DNSBLs in general.
I think a lot of us had a pretty good idea which DNSBL is usually the
one in question when people are complaining....
The difficulty is that the current line of argument is that because some DNSBLs
are operated badly, DNSBLs are bad.
For any interesting capability, there will always be some bad actors using it.
So the argument that, therefore, the capability is unworthy of standardization
is problematic.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf