ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-03

2008-11-26 13:39:36
Hi Ben,

Oops, I messed up the Gen-ART review boilerplate. Please mentally insert the following text at the top of my review:

I think we'll let you off just this once.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-03
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date:  2008-11-25
IETF LC End Date: 2008-11-30
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC.

Nits:

-- Don't forget the new IPR boilerplate.

Yes, lucky us. When we revise the I-D we will hack in the new boilerplate.

-- Abstract, paragraph 3:

Section 8 talks about MP2P, so it is not strictly true that this document only considers P2P . (Repeated at end of introduction).

Yes, I suppose this could be clearer.
The point is that only the issue of how to scale the provision of P2P LSPs is considered. The fact that one of the solutions is MP2P confuses this, so I am sure we can come up with a few words to make it a little clearer.

-- Section 2, 1st paragraph:

Please expand LSR on first mention.

-- Section 2.4, 2nd paragraph:

Please expand NMS and EMS on first mention.

Yes to all three.

-- Section 3.3, paragraph 2: "The consideration must be..."

Is there a word missing? I assume you don't mean "The consideration" to mean the _only_ consideration, since you mention others below.

In fact, the other considerations mentioned in later paragraphs in that section are factors of physical topology. So we really did intend that there was only one primary consideration. But we can wordsmith this a little.

Cheers,
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>