Lawrence Rosen wrote:
Lisa and Chris have stated that they're open to consider chartering
new WG if there seems to be consensus on a charter.
What about it, folks?
As one of the people who objected when the previous spam WG was under way, I
now support this proposal to form a new WG to address the technical problem.
Can folks who want a working group explain what technical work is needed for the
current specification?
What deficiencies need to be remedied and what enhancements need to be made?
Please explain these requirements in terms of community need as indicated by
those who will use the output.
I suspect that the closer your responses are to text that should be in a
charter, the more helpful it will be for justifying a working group.
Thanks.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf