David Romerstein wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Randy Presuhn wrote:
Agreed, but if those analogies are correct, they also undermine the argument.
Neither the email sender nor the recipient (the ones to whom email is most
important) typically have any voice whatsoever in the selection of the DNSBL.
End recipients *absolutely* have a voice in the DNSbl selection process.
They have the option of voting with their feet if their ISP chooses a
DNSbl that negatively impacts them.
Or as in the case with a non-ISP (eg: a corporate environment like us),
they _are_ the end recipients. The liability for missed email, for
example, is entirely the corporation's.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf