Neither XP nor Mac OS X can be relied on to have accurate time sync,
although they in theory come with time syncing enabled by default.
Unfortunately, you just can't rely on synchronized clocks in all but
the most controlled of circumstances (and I think it's almost always a
poor idea, even then).
Bruce
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Das, Saumitra
<saumitra(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi Roni,
What I mean is that typical machines on the planetlab testbed (linux
based) show this drift. This may be alleviated with xp boxes since they may
sync silently with time.windows.com when a network connection is up. In
linux, clock drift problems have been known to exist because ntpdate may not
be setup to work often enough.
Thanks
Saumitra
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:24 AM
To: Das, Saumitra; p2psip(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion
Hi,
I am not sure what you mean NTP refresh, if the test was using the system
clock than you would expect in XP that it will be updated every tick which
is 10 or 15 msec which can account for the error. NTP is used in RTP (RFC
3550) for synchronization and the RTP time is using the system clock which
may add skew but it is not because of NTP.
Roni Even
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Das,
Saumitra
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:31 AM
To: p2psip(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion
Hi Song,
Even in the planetlab testbed, the following paper at PAM 2008 (
http://pam2008.cs.wpi.edu/slides/pathak.ppt ) shows that more than 40% of
nodes have more than 20ms NTP error. In a general overlay we are likely to
find a larger fraction of nodes with error in their NTP time (since the
planetlab testbed is managed by the people who own the machines while
general overlay nodes are unlikely to be that well maintained). Unless NTP
refresh is made mandatory within a p2psip implementation, relying on ntp
would be unlikely to be helpful to diagnostics
Thanks
Saumitra
www.saumitra.info
===============
Dear all,
In P2PSIP base protocol, Ping is used to test connectivity along a path.
However, connectivity quality can not be measured well without some useful
information, such as the timestamp and HopCounter. In p2psip diagnostics
draft version 03 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-03.txt
we extend the Ping message payloads with a few kinds of useful information
for connectivity quality check purposes.
The initiator node receiving the Ping response should compute the overlay
hops to the destination peer for the statistics of connectivity quality from
the perspective of overlay hops.
About the Timestamp, we are not sure if the NTP time is a good candidate for
it, or we have other ways to describe it, or we don't need the timestamp at
all. But if NTP time is used in the overlay, then it is a good choice,
because every peer along the message path will know when the message is
generated, and it is easy for the peer along the path to calculate the
message latency. However many overlays may not be synchronized with the NTP
time. Any comments?
Best Regards,
Song Haibin
Email: melodysong at huawei.com
Skype: alexsonghw
_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf