Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application de

    > From: David Conrad <drc(_at_)virtualized(_dot_)org>

    > The architecture is _ALREADY_ broken. 66NAT is merely another symptom
    > of the underlying disease.

Hey, that's what happens when you pick as 'the next generation of networking',
"X.25 with a larger sequence number space" (or, for you youngsters who don't
remember X.25, "ATM with a larger cell size").

        Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf