Andrew Sullivan schrieb:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg53776.html
For the impatient, one fundamental problem is that the current
behaviour uses A records that do not contain host addresses, which is
contrary to the definition of an A record.
And this counts as "fairly serious damage to the DNS protocol"? This
seems like a *tiny* bit exaggerated.
The suggestion to use a dedicated RRTYPE is nice, but many others have
failed in this endeavour before.
-- Matthias
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf