Standard Track and BCP RFCs are part of the IETF document
stream. The proposed IRTF document stream (draft-irtf-rfcs) doesn't
create a new class of documents called IRTF BCPs.
Quite right. That's why we're having the argument here about
draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.
Shouldn't the headings of the two documents coming out of the ASRG be
"Network Working Group" instead of "Anti-Spam Research Group" as the
intended category is part of the IETF stream?
The boilerplate in the drafts is all generated by xml2rfc. I presume
that the RFC Editor can adjust it appropriately.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf