Please read response below.
I am not a technical expert, thus my understanding
could be flawed, thus I would like to say sorry for any
errors throughout this.
Regards
Meeku
--- On Tue, 4/11/08, Ruszlan Gaszanov <ruszlan(_at_)ather(_dot_)net> wrote:
From: Ruszlan Gaszanov <ruszlan(_at_)ather(_dot_)net>
Subject: RE: Solutions to the IDN Problems Discussed
To: linuxalinux(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk
Cc: unicode(_at_)unicode(_dot_)org
Date: Tuesday, 4 November, 2008, 11:34 AM
There is a problem with solution #1 - it already
exists :) though for semi-ASCII language and
Internationalised domain names it does not work :(
because I visited this website
http://www.nameisp.com/puny.asp and did an
experiment
with total-ASCII language domain names and the
punycode representation was the same as the domain
name. Thus there is a problem with punycode machine
code presently, as it "cheats" and does not
"code" the
total-ASCII language domain names like it does with
semi-ASCII language and Internationalised domain
names.
......
Any other implementation would be incompatible with
existing DNS
infrastructure and requires developing a completely new
name-lookup protocol
as well as setting up a parallel server infrastructure.
Punycode exists at the Whois for Internationalised Domain Names and you could
easily put a Y2K project management with a timeline for ending old type ASCII
registrations and where new type Punycode registrations would commence at ASCII
names. ASCII names would get processed via the Punycode field like you have
with IDN and your previous ASCII field shuts, that's all. Both systems could
exist simultaneously, the new process open and the previous closed yet
continuing then later when there's learning curve development you could
consider correcting the old type closed ASCII system. This system would allow
registrations that are (1) IDN (Internationalised Domain Name) and also those
that are (2) MDN (Multilingual Domain Names).
Since such protocol
would be fundamentally incompatible with any existing
internet applications,
new software will have to be developed. This would
practically mean
creating a second Internet.
Software applications would catch-up to this via the Y2K sort project
management and also via market. Unicode got accepted then Punycode at ASCII
registrations compatibility should also get accepted.
Considering the cost and time requirements of such a
project, as well as all
the confusion and inconveniences the transition would
cause, I do not really
believe the user community would benefit from it. In any
case this kind of
project is quite beyond the mandates of either ICANN or
Unicode Consortium.
You have Punycode existing at IDN then you can also use same at ASCII. Only
the registration window get's changed and you have an extended Punycode that
also changes ASCII registration into Punycode. The user community would really
become happy because you would get quicker IDN implementation and a new type
registration that are Multilingual. Software application integration would
happen early. This would help those people that speak / write more than one
language. People could then interact better and with virtue atmosphere than
before they were able to with only their single language domains and software
applications. You find that there are countries where the railway stations are
using their traditional languages as well as the english language. The world
has become more cosmopolitan and thus you need this to happen very urgently.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf