Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74

On Nov 27, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Matthew Ford wrote:

> After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel  
> quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be  
> able to point to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a  
> significant milestone.

Data point: IETF65 (Dallas) had a DNSSEC enabled recursive nameserver  
(and, if I recall well, signed reverse zones). No impact noticed  
whatsoever. I wonder how many people actually knew.

--Olaf

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf