--On Saturday, 06 December, 2008 17:53 -0700 Cullen Jennings
<fluffy(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
I think it would be good to finally enforce the rules for
agenda submissions. For instance, if no agenda for a
meeting is published in time, the meeting shouldn't take
place.
+1
But in practice, every time something is late, an exception is
made for it.
While I would favor more enforcement of those rules, I'm not
personally convinced that this is enough of a problem by itself
and fixing it would make a lot of difference.
However, in practice, late agendas are either a problem or they
are not a problem. If they are not a problem, we should stop
pretending that they are. If they are a problem, then the AD
granting the exception, or the entire IESG, should be held
accountable by the community for encouraging the problems to
occur.
We really can't have it both ways, and neither can the WGs or
the IESG.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf