This has been an interesting (at times) philosophical discussion.
However, as editor of a WG Internet-Draft, I have a couple of very
pragmatic questions that I hope someone can answer authoritatively:
1. What do I, as editor of an I-D and previously editor of a related
RFC that is not quoted in the current I-D, need to do in order to allow
the WG chairs to move my draft forward into IETF Last Call?
2. What do the co-editors of the WG's other I-D, who were previously
also the co-editors of a related RFC that *is* quoted in the current
I-D, and at least one of whom has co-authored other RFCs, need to do to
allow the WG chairs to move *their* draft forward into IETF Last Call?
Our WG has stalled due to the uncertainty surrounding the legal
requirements and verbiage. None of us are attorneys, AFAIK, but all of
us would like to get our work done.
--
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf