Re: Last Call: draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf (Reduced Backus-Naur Form(RBN

Since it isn't ABNF, perhaps BBNF?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>

> --On Friday, February 06, 2009 20:59 -0500 Tony Hansen
> <tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:
>
> > Going back to RFC 2205,
> >
> >       These rules are specified using Backus-Naur Form (BNF)
> > augmented       with square brackets surrounding optional
> > sub-sequences.
> >
> > What do you think of BNFO, for "Backus-Naur Form with Options"?
> >
> > or BNFB, for "Backus-Naur Form with Brackets"?
> Either one would work for me and would be much more descriptive
> of what is going on than "Reduced".
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf