Hi -
It might be a bit more credible if they offered a plausible alternative
technology. Have they said when they'll post their I-D (meeting all
RFC 5378 requirements, of course)?
Randy
From: "AJ Jaghori" <ciscoworkz(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
To: "mshore" <mshore(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>; "Jeffrey Hankins"
<jhankin1(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>; <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>;
<campaigns(_at_)fsf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: I Love this subject header! (was Re: Reject TLS!)
Lol :)
Its an interesting attempt, to say the least...
On 2/9/09, mshore <mshore(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 2/8/09 11:22 AM, "Jeffrey Hankins" <jhankin1(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Please stand up for software freedom and reject the TLS proposal until
RedPhone Security issues a royalty-free patent for TLS. Thank you.
And the content cracks me way the heck up, too. Otherwise
this is really, really annoying. What, these people think
the IETF takes votes?
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Sent from my mobile device
AJ Jaghori
Chief Architect, Author, & Professor | Data Network & Security
ciscoworkz(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
"Sent via my Android Powered Mobile..."
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf