In message <20090211233244(_dot_)GA23152(_at_)localdomain>, Ward Vandewege
writes:
Hi Noel,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:39:19PM -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Thank you for being part of a crowd of hundreds of people who have mailbomb
ed
the mailboxes of thousands of IETF 'members' (since we don't have any forma
l
membership, just an email list). As a result, we all have such positive
feeling about the FSF.
I appreciate that's a problem. However, maybe that's a sign that perhaps next
time the IETF shouldn't *ask* for comments to be sent to the mailing list?
The IESG is considering approving this draft as a standards track
RFC. The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community has
consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as a proposed
standard. Comments can be sent to ietf at ietf.org or exceptionally to
iesg at ietf.org. Comments should be sent by 2009-02-11.
That's from
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg05617.html
We all did exactly as you asked. If that caused problems, please consider
creating a separate mechanism for comments next time. But don't blame people
for following your guidelines. That's just silly.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
JHV Consulting USA
Colocation, dedicated and virtual servers, hosting
http://jhvc.com
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
The message was sent to the "IETF community" for comment.
It wasn't sent to the public for comment. It didn't request
comments from the public.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf