On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:04 PM,
<bmanning(_at_)vacation(_dot_)karoshi(_dot_)com> wrote:
we now return you to your rant.
Sorry, if I sounded too harsh.
my error here - Paul said DNS does no ordering... he did not specify
ordering of what.
Order of RRs in zone file is not relevant for the order "on the wire".
DNS (as in DNS protocol) does no ordering.
Ondrej.
--bill
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:54:37PM +0000, Chris Thompson wrote:
On Mar 4 2009, OndE ej SurC= wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:57 PM,
<bmanning(_at_)vacation(_dot_)karoshi(_dot_)com> wrote:
[...]
DNSSEC does reorder RRSets within a zone. Which is a new
feature.
When we started talking about order of RRSets? This is purely
discussion
about order of RRs in RRSet. Order of RRSets in zone is irrelevant
before
DNSSEC and also after DNSSEC. Nothing depends on order of RRSets
at least in my best knowledge.
I took Bill to mean "DNSSEC does reorder RRs within an RRset" anyway, as
I don't know in what other sense DNSSEC is relevant at all.
But the canonical ordering of RRs within an RRset for signing purposes
says nothing about the presentation order in the answers to DNS queries.
And in fact a certain well-known nameserver implementation not
unassociated
with Paul still supports all the rrset-order and sortlist controls, which
work for secured zones as well as unsecured ones.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1(_at_)cam(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
--
Ondrej Sury
technicky reditel/Chief Technical Officer
-----------------------------------------
CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry
Americka 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic
mailto:ondrej(_dot_)sury(_at_)nic(_dot_)cz http://nic.cz/
sip:ondrej(_dot_)sury(_at_)nic(_dot_)cz
<sip%3Aondrej(_dot_)sury(_at_)nic(_dot_)cz> tel:+420.222745110
mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112
-----------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf