IETF Discussion (date)
March 31, 2009
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review, Sam Hartman, 19:16
- Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery (NAT Behavior Discovery Using STUN) to Experimental RFC, Cullen Jennings, 12:54
- vMeet: effort to improve remote IETF participation, Dave CROCKER, 11:58
- Re: Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6, Glen, 11:49
- Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider, Nick Levinson, 11:46
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review, Michael Menth, 11:45
- Re: Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6, Glen, 11:31
- Re: Downloading a whole maillist's archive, Robert Moskowitz, 08:20
- Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider, John R. Levine, 07:12
- Re: Downloading a whole maillist's archive, Lars Eggert, 01:12
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review - LISP does not involve separate namespaces for EIDs and RLOCs, Robin Whittle, 01:03
March 30, 2009
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review - LISP does not involve separate namespaces for EIDs and RLOCs, Sam Hartman, 22:53
- Downloading a whole maillist's archive, Robert Moskowitz, 22:42
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review, Sam Hartman, 22:41
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review - LISP does not involve separate namespaces for EIDs and RLOCs, Robin Whittle, 21:21
- Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6, Robert Moskowitz, 18:41
- Re: Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6, Jeroen Massar, 18:10
- Re: Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6, John Jason Brzozowski, 18:02
- Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6, Robert Moskowitz, 17:57
- Re: designate an email address for testing at any provider, John Levine, 17:27
- RE: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri, 13:35
- designate an email address for testing at any provider, Nick Levinson, 12:58
- Re: [lisp] LISP: update to charter in external review, Dow Street, 12:57
- Re: LISP: update to charter in external review, David Meyer, 12:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-camellia (The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP) to Informational RFC, David Crick, 12:53
- RE: LISP: update to charter in external review, Darrel Lewis (darlewis), 12:52
- Re: IPR/Copyright, Spencer Dawkins, 10:19
- Re: LISP: update to charter in external review, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:43
March 25, 2009
- Subscription information for ietf-nomcom, Spencer Dawkins, 20:04
- Re: IETF74 plenary stream URL, Henrik Levkowetz, 19:35
- IETF74 plenary stream URL, Morgan Sackett, 18:51
- Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Tom.Petch, 14:33
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", David W. Hankins, 13:44
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Jeroen Massar, 13:28
- Re: Welcome to the "Dnsop-honest" mailing list, Tim Chown, 13:24
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Joe Abley, 13:10
- Re: Last Call: draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis (Change Process forthe Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard], Spencer Dawkins, 03:01
- RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 10, Issue 77, aziz temmar, 02:41
- RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 10, Issue 76, aziz temmar, 02:39
- Re: IPR/Copyright, Ray Pelletier, 01:09
- Re: IPR/Copyright, Andrew G. Malis, 00:54
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Douglas Otis, 00:21
March 24, 2009
- request for community assistance regarding TICTOC requirements, Yaakov Stein, 23:07
- Re: IPR/Copyright, SM, 20:14
- Proposal RE: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:56
- Re: IPR/Copyright, Scott Brim, 19:55
- IPR/Copyright, John C Klensin, 19:36
- RE: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Von Wootten, Karl, 19:29
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Ole Jacobsen, 18:43
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Kurt Zeilenga, 18:29
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", David Morris, 17:53
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Ole Jacobsen, 16:21
- comments on draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp-09.txt, David McGrew, 14:37
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Fred Baker, 14:36
- Re: NoteWell use pertains to the IETF Mailing Lists too - but hey - anyone with half a brain should have known that - WAS: Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Theodore Tso, 12:45
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: New FAQ on IETF Copyright Policy available (FYI), Ed Juskevicius, 12:37
- Re: NoteWell use pertains to the IETF Mailing Lists too - but hey - anyone with half a brain should have known that - WAS: Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Melinda Shore, 10:26
- NoteWell use pertains to the IETF Mailing Lists too - but hey - anyone with half a brain should have known that - WAS: Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Todd Glassey CISM CIFI, 10:17
- RE: [Ietf-honest] Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:47
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: New FAQ on IETF Copyright Policy available (FYI), Simon Josefsson, 04:22
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Joe Abley, 02:12
March 23, 2009
- RE: [Ietf-honest] Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:29
- RE: [Ietf-honest] Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:55
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", John Levine, 21:35
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", ned+ietf, 19:40
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Melinda Shore, 19:25
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Michael Loftis, 18:34
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Michael Loftis, 18:31
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Dave CROCKER, 18:29
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Melinda Shore, 18:06
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Daniel Brown, 17:55
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Andrew Sullivan, 17:53
- Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Steven M. Bellovin, 17:47
- Subscriptions to "ietf-honest", Melinda Shore, 17:36
- Audio streams for IETF 74 in San Francisco, Morgan Sackett, 15:55
- Fwd: [multimob] Agenda for SF Meeting, Marshall Eubanks, 02:27
March 22, 2009
- ANNOUNCEMENT: New FAQ on IETF Copyright Policy available (FYI), Ed Juskevicius, 23:58
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Keith Moore, 21:07
- Suggestion for draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Suresh Krishnan, 19:25
- Re: NAT66 multihoming red herring, was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Brian E Carpenter, 16:19
- RE: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Dan Wing, 16:00
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Melinda Shore, 15:44
- RE: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Dan Wing, 15:39
- NAT66 multihoming red herring, was: Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:27
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 14:40
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 14:39
- RE: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Dan Wing, 14:28
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Joel Jaeggli, 14:05
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Melinda Shore, 14:01
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 13:53
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 13:29
- RE: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Dan Wing, 13:10
- RE: Last Call: draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis (Change Process for theSession Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Elwell, John, 11:41
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 10:34
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Brian E Carpenter, 10:31
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 10:22
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 10:14
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 10:11
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Geoff Huston, 00:34
- Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI, 00:01
March 21, 2009
- Re: Running Code, Philip Matthews, 21:29
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Masataka Ohta, 20:12
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Rémi Després, 19:55
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Brian E Carpenter, 19:08
- Audio Streams for IETF 74 in San Francisco, Morgan Sackett, 18:56
- RE: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00 FYI, Richard Shockey, 15:53
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Rémi Després, 13:14
- Audio Streaming in SF?, Julian Reschke, 05:44
March 20, 2009
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Fred Baker, 19:51
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Fred Baker, 19:50
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Brian E Carpenter, 17:41
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:19
- Query regarding Context Memory Feedback Option, Chaitanya Pradeep, 09:14
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 01:05
March 19, 2009
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Christian Vogt, 17:34
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Christian Vogt, 17:22
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Brian E Carpenter, 16:49
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Keith Moore, 15:27
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Pete Resnick, 14:05
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Keith Moore, 08:18
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Yaakov Stein, 04:37
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Lixia Zhang, 02:44
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Lixia Zhang, 01:50
March 18, 2009
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Christian Vogt, 21:17
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Robin Whittle, 21:05
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Keith Moore, 20:59
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Christian Vogt, 20:08
- Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Scott Brim, 13:25
- Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00, Christian Vogt, 12:45
March 17, 2009
- Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Suresh Krishnan, 20:39
- FW: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees Announce the start of a new 30-day Community Review ..., Ed Juskevicius, 20:10
- Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Alexey Melnikov, 15:22
- Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Randy Presuhn, 15:14
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-06, Ben Campbell, 15:06
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, SM, 13:07
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Tom.Petch, 12:28
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees Announce the start of a new 30-day Community Review ..., Mr. James W. Laferriere, 12:25
- ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees Announce the start of a new 30-day Community Review ..., Ed Juskevicius, 11:21
- Re: Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Tom.Petch, 06:37
- Query regarding Additional Mode transition logic for IR & IR-Dyn Packets (Interoperabilty), Chaitanya Pradeep, 02:20
March 15, 2009
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI, 20:08
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 15:32
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Alessandro Vesely, 14:14
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI, 11:56
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John Levine, 11:32
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Alessandro Vesely, 10:38
March 13, 2009
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Doug Ewell, 21:30
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, grenville armitage, 20:15
- Re: Last Call: draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis (Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard], Alan Johnston, 17:56
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 13:51
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:45
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 12:14
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 12:13
- Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 12:12
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 12:11
- Re: Fixing the Process: RFC Publication - Patent contamination protection- Standards designation, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI, 09:57
- Fixing the Process: RFC Publication - Patent contamination protection - Standards designation, Mohsen BANAN, 04:34
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Mohsen BANAN, 04:27
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Mohsen BANAN, 04:26
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Mohsen BANAN, 04:17
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 00:53
March 12, 2009
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Dave CROCKER, 17:54
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eliot Lear, 17:25
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf, 17:10
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, John C Klensin, 14:02
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Tony Finch, 11:47
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Scott Brim, 11:13
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Andrew Sullivan, 11:02
- RE: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:59
- RE: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Eran Hammer-Lahav, 01:15
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Dean Willis, 00:31
March 11, 2009
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Eran Hammer-Lahav, 20:32
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Ralf Weber, 20:20
- Does being an RFC mean anything?, Joe Baptista, 20:18
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, TSG, 19:54
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, James Aldridge, 19:52
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Melinda Shore, 17:34
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Michael Loftis, 16:29
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Ofer Inbar, 16:24
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Joe Abley, 16:10
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Dave CROCKER, 16:07
- Re: Does being an RFC mean anything?, Spencer Dawkins, 15:57
- Does being an RFC mean anything?, Lawrence Rosen, 15:25
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eliot Lear, 14:46
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Cullen Jennings, 14:43
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 14:31
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 14:30
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 14:29
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf, 14:20
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga, 10:21
- Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla, 10:11
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM, 09:47
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dave Cridland, 08:39
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:10
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 05:45
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Alessandro Vesely, 05:28
March 10, 2009
- SECDIR review of draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-11, Richard Barnes, 22:50
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Peter Saint-Andre, 21:54
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 21:49
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Theodore Tso, 21:00
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf, 20:30
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Joel Jaeggli, 19:47
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eran Hammer-Lahav, 19:27
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 19:11
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Kurt Zeilenga, 18:01
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dean Willis, 17:33
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Paul Hoffman, 16:36
- "Unresolved" patent issues [Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz], Brian E Carpenter, 16:33
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:24
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 15:31
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM, 15:10
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin, 14:35
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Paul Hoffman, 13:31
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 13:25
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Neil Cook, 12:47
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 12:46
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Neil Cook, 12:45
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Danny Mayer, 12:44
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:09
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Stephan Wenger, 09:41
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Spencer Dawkins, 08:27
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Dave Cridland, 08:22
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Spencer Dawkins, 08:14
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 00:39
March 09, 2009
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:41
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Stephan Wenger, 18:39
- Reminder: Tools codesprint at IETF74, Robert Sparks, 18:03
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:44
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:27
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM, 14:42
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin, 14:14
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, SM, 14:09
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Andrew Sullivan, 13:15
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer, 13:14
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 13:13
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Danny Mayer, 13:12
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 13:11
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman, 13:11
- Re: [IAB] SAVI/SHARA/BEHAVE/AUTOCONF/LISP conflicts (Was: Re: 74th IETF - Agenda), Lixia Zhang, 13:10
- RE: jim bound, Templin, Fred L, 12:41
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 11:56
- Re: Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], Alexandru Petrescu, 04:52
March 07, 2009
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John C Klensin, 23:54
- Re: Passing of Jim Bound, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 23:29
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Olafur Gudmundsson, 23:24
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Steven M. Bellovin, 23:07
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, David Conrad, 22:50
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Christian Huitema, 22:39
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, ned+ietf, 21:00
- Re: Passing of Jim Bound, Robert Moskowitz, 21:00
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 20:59
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 20:44
- Re: Running Code, ned+ietf, 19:41
- Re: Running Code, Cullen Jennings, 16:14
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Cullen Jennings, 15:52
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Cullen Jennings, 15:50
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, David Morris, 14:22
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Henrik Levkowetz, 14:03
- Re: Running Code, Doug Ewell, 14:02
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 13:43
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 13:13
- Re: jim bound, Michael Loftis, 05:21
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Julian Reschke, 03:46
- jim bound, Paul Vixie, 02:25
March 06, 2009
- Re: Running Code, Scott Lawrence, 23:30
- A proposal of global disussion about communication protocols, for accelerating democratic activities including discussing economic policy, election and voting, Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI, 23:17
- RE: Abstract on Page 1?, Scott Lawrence, 23:05
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Doug Otis, 19:43
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Simon Josefsson, 19:42
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs (Industrial Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu, 19:22
- Re: [Roll] Last Call: draft-ietf-roll-building-routing-reqs (Building Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks) to Informational RFC, Alexandru Petrescu, 19:21
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga, 19:07
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John C Klensin, 18:22
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga, 18:14
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Sam Hartman, 18:02
- RE: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Lawrence Rosen, 17:59
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, John C Klensin, 17:39
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-lemonade-streaming-09, Spencer Dawkins, 17:30
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga, 17:09
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla, 17:02
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga, 16:59
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla, 16:37
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla, 16:33
- IAOC/IAD Office Hours at IETF 74 in San Francisco, Ray Pelletier, 15:19
- Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga, 14:34
- Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Tim Polk, 14:21
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 13:25
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 13:23
- Re: Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], ned+ietf, 11:54
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 00:53
March 05, 2009
- RE: Abstract on Page 1?, John C Klensin, 14:49
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Joel Jaeggli, 13:48
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Andrew Sullivan, 13:40
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Dave CROCKER, 13:39
- RE: Abstract on Page 1?, Paul Hoffman, 13:38
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Doug Otis, 13:32
- RE: Abstract on Page 1?, John C Klensin, 13:15
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 13:08
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 12:37
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 12:36
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 12:35
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Ondřej Surý, 12:33
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Ondřej Surý, 12:32
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer, 12:31
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer, 12:30
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer, 12:29
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Chris Thompson, 12:28
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, bmanning, 12:27
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Andrew Sullivan, 09:30
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Dave Cridland, 09:10
- RE: Abstract on Page 1?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:49
- Re: Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], Doug Ewell, 08:43
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 08:35
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Doug Ewell, 08:30
- Re: Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Jeroen Massar, 08:16
- Reverse IPv6 DNS checks on ietf MXs?, Tim Chown, 08:05
- Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tim Chown, 07:06
- Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Jari Arkko, 06:32
- Re: IETF speed -- was Re: Running Code, Lars Eggert, 03:41
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Olaf Kolkman, 02:43
March 04, 2009
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 23:58
- Re: Running Code, Henning Schulzrinne, 23:00
- Re: Running Code, Pete Resnick, 18:03
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Steven M. Bellovin, 17:05
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Scott Kitterman, 16:59
- RE: Passing of Jim Bound, Russ Housley, 16:40
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, TSG, 16:05
- Early implementers motivations [was Re: Running Code], Marc Petit-Huguenin, 16:04
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Mark Andrews, 16:03
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 15:56
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 15:55
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Elwyn Davies, 15:42
- Re: Running Code, ned+ietf, 14:54
- Re: Running Code, ned+ietf, 14:43
- RE: Running Code, Hannes Tschofenig, 14:33
- Re: Running Code, Melinda Shore, 14:29
- IANA "Office Hours" at IETF-74 in San Francisco, Michelle Cotton, 14:03
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dean Willis, 14:00
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 13:43
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Livingood, Jason, 13:22
- Re: Running Code, Melinda Shore, 13:21
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Rémi Després, 13:11
- Re: Running Code, Henning Schulzrinne, 12:45
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Paul Hoffman, 12:32
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Paul Vixie, 12:31
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Ondřej Surý, 12:30
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Nicholas Weaver, 12:29
- Re: Running Code, Henry Sinnreich, 12:28
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Florian Weimer, 12:27
- IETF speed -- was Re: Running Code, Alfred Hönes, 12:25
- RE: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Christian Huitema, 12:22
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 12:20
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 12:14
- Re: [dnsext] Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 12:07
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 11:59
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Margaret Wasserman, 11:38
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 11:09
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, ned+ietf, 11:07
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Andrew Sullivan, 10:56
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Julian Reschke, 10:51
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Marshall Eubanks, 10:50
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Melinda Shore, 10:45
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Tim Bray, 10:43
- Re: Abstract on Page 1?, Stewart Bryant, 10:39
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 10:37
- Abstract on Page 1?, Margaret Wasserman, 10:34
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 10:32
- Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 10:13
- Re: Running Code, Andy Bierman, 10:12
- Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Andrew Sullivan, 09:59
- RE: Running Code, Hannes Tschofenig, 09:58
- Re: Running Code, Peter Saint-Andre, 09:53
- Re: Running Code, ned+ietf, 09:48
- Re: Running Code, Andrew Sullivan, 09:43
- RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems, Tony Finch, 09:10
- Re: Running Code, Jari Arkko, 07:24
- Re: Running Code, Lars Eggert, 06:04
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:32
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 04:44
- Re: Running Code, Alessandro Vesely, 04:15
- RE: Running Code, Hannes Tschofenig, 02:52
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lynn St.Amour, 01:14
March 03, 2009
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 23:55
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 23:42
- Re: Running Code, Masataka Ohta, 23:09
- Re: Running Code, ned+ietf, 22:39
- Re: Running Code, Andy Bierman, 21:50
- Re: Running Code, Gary E. Miller, 21:36
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 21:18
- Re: Running Code, Masataka Ohta, 21:17
- RE: Running Code, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:52
- Re: Running Code, Henning Schulzrinne, 20:37
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Mark Andrews, 19:16
- Re: Running Code, Harald Alvestrand, 18:42
- Stepping back a bit Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Leslie Daigle, 18:40
- Re: Passing of Jim Bound, Philip Nesser, 18:03
- Re: Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 17:44
- Re: Running Code, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:32
- Passing of Jim Bound, Russ Housley, 17:00
- Re: Running Code, Brian E Carpenter, 16:55
- Repair of Public Mail List Archives Complete, Alexa Morris, 16:21
- Running Code, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 16:17
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Mark Andrews, 15:52
- Tools to Publish I-Ds with pre-5378 Content, Ray Pelletier, 15:40
- RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig, 14:03
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 12:51
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Samuel Weiler, 12:26
- Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-seed-srtp (The SEED Cipher Algorithm and Its Use with the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)) to Proposed Standard, The IESG, 12:25
- RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:32
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:12
- RE: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin, 05:11
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 04:37
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dean Willis, 03:35
March 02, 2009
- Re: ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization), Brian E Carpenter, 22:08
- Re: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Randy Presuhn, 20:36
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM, 20:22
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Joel Jaeggli, 17:40
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Dave CROCKER, 16:54
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Alexa Morris, 16:42
- RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Paul Hoffman, 16:37
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Joel Jaeggli, 16:25
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Steven M. Bellovin, 16:20
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Joel Jaeggli, 14:54
- RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig, 14:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 13:49
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Joel Jaeggli, 13:30
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, John C Klensin, 13:17
- draft-p2pi-cooper-workshop-report, Vijay K. Gurbani, 13:09
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, JFC Morfin, 13:08
- Re: [Ltru] draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred valuefor YU, Randy Presuhn, 13:00
- RE: draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Phillips, Addison, 12:52
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos, 12:49
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 11:39
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 11:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM, 11:17
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER, 11:05
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 10:59
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER, 10:49
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM, 10:48
- Re: Comments requested on recent appeal to the IESG, Douglas Otis, 09:40
- Re: Terminal room at IETF74, Richard Barnes, 09:14
- RE: Terminal room at IETF74, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:03
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Olaf Kolkman, 06:44
- New IETF Journal available now (Volume 4, Issue 3), Mirjam Kuehne, 06:42
- Identity Services Beyond Web SSO (was RE: [TLS] TLS WG Chair Comments on draft-ietf-tls-authz-07), Josh Howlett, 05:29
- Terminal room at IETF74, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 05:04
- draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt issue with preferred value for YU, Tex Texin, 04:06
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström, 01:24
March 01, 2009
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, Dave CROCKER, 23:21
- Re: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard, SM, 23:00
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, John C Klensin, 22:13
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Eran Hammer-Lahav, 22:07
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Eric Rescorla, 20:42
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lynn St.Amour, 17:50
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER, 17:00
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, James M. Polk, 16:49
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lucy Lynch, 16:47
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström, 16:40
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:36
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER, 16:22
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:05
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Patrik Fältström, 13:55
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Dave CROCKER, 13:18
- RE: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Hannes Tschofenig, 12:59
- Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?, Lucy Lynch, 12:30
- RE: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, Dave Nelson, 08:29
- Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF, Alessandro Vesely, 05:39