Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz

    Actually, in this case, an Experimental RFC is sufficient to assign
    a code point. The requirement is 2434 IETF Consensus.

If that is true, an experimental RFC constitutes a very important kind of  
approval.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, (continued) Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eliot Lear Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Doug Ewell Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Andrew Sullivan Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Scott Brim Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Mohsen BANAN Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Kurt Zeilenga Message not available Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Eric Rescorla RE: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: [Ietf-honest] Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Richard M Stallman <= Re: Consensus Call for draft-housley-tls-authz, Simon Josefsson