Sam Hartman skrev:
I'd like to present the following revised charter to the community
(and with Jari's approval) to the IESG for review. This charter
represents discussion on the LISP list and in the LISP session at IETF
74.
Sam,
thanks for the update - this is the first I've seen on the IETF list
about LISP for a while, so I assume that it's appropriate to continue
discussion there at this time; I'm not a member of the LISP list.
One point of clarification: Is it the intent of the LISP WG that "IP" in
this proposed charter text should be read as "IPv4 or IPv6"?
My understanding (seen from a VERY long distance) is that the routing
scaling problems are substantially the same for both dialects of IP, and
that initial efforts have focused on encapsulating either, with the
initial experiments using IPv4 as the encapsulating protocol.
Is this understanding correct?
Harald
IPv6: When four billion is a small number.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf