ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Running Code

2009-03-04 06:04:24
Hi,

On 2009-3-3, at 22:54, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I think adding any new mandatory section to all I-Ds is a bad idea.
It will quickly become bureaucratic. We've had proposals for mandatory
Management Considerations, IPv6 Considerations, and no doubt others
that I've forgotten, and they all have the same problem.

agree with Brian.

Also, RFC4858 already recommends that the "Document Quality" section of the document announcement that is emailed out when the IESG approves a document describe implementation status. So it's not like we don't have a way in which to document implementation status; we simply don't do it very often.

Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>