Hi,
On 2009-3-3, at 22:54, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I think adding any new mandatory section to all I-Ds is a bad idea.
It will quickly become bureaucratic. We've had proposals for mandatory
Management Considerations, IPv6 Considerations, and no doubt others
that I've forgotten, and they all have the same problem.
agree with Brian.
Also, RFC4858 already recommends that the "Document Quality" section
of the document announcement that is emailed out when the IESG
approves a document describe implementation status. So it's not like
we don't have a way in which to document implementation status; we
simply don't do it very often.
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf