ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 10, Issue 76

2009-03-25 02:39:13

arreter de m'envoyer vos pub non seleument je ne comprend pas l'anglais et jai 
pas besoin merci 
 
From: ietf-request(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Ietf Digest, Vol 10, Issue 76
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:05:32 -0700

Send Ietf mailing list submissions to
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ietf-request(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org

You can reach the person managing the list at
ietf-owner(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Ietf digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Proposal RE: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest"
(Hallam-Baker, Phillip)
2. Re: IPR/Copyright (SM)
3. request for community assistance regarding TICTOC
requirements (Yaakov Stein)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:51:18 -0700
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>
Subject: Proposal RE: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest"
To: "Von Wootten, Karl" 
<Karl(_dot_)vonWootten(_at_)det(_dot_)nsw(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au>, "Ole
Jacobsen" <ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>, "Dean Anderson" 
<dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com>
Cc: ietf-honest(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org, Fred Baker 
<fred(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>, IETF
Discussion Mailing List <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Message-ID:
<2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B34B(_at_)mou1wnexmb09(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I suggest that all mail that is cross posted to Mr Andreson IETF-Honest or 
whatever other spam list Mr Spammer decides to create be blocked from all 
IETF lists.

That way any IETF-er who feeds the troll will not anoy the rest. And any 
IETF-er who blacklists Mr Spammer and his spam lists will have an 
Anderson-free experience.

Since Mr Spammer's objective here is to cause the spillover into the IETF 
list, it is my expectation that he will cease this particular tactic.




________________________________

From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org on behalf of Von Wootten, Karl
Sent: Tue 3/24/2009 7:29 PM
To: 'Ole Jacobsen'; Dean Anderson
Cc: ietf-honest(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org; Fred Baker; 'IETF Discussion 
Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest"



Dean,
I feel that this issue has gone on Long enough It seems to me that by not 
allowing people to opt out and by unsolicited subscriptions you are only 
damaging your own reputation. I read what is posted to the lists I subscribe 
to so that I can do my job better. Not to waste time with these silly flame 
wars. Can we please put an end to this?

Karl von Wootten
System Engineer Infrastructure Services
NSW Department of Education and Training
Ph: 02 84254515
Mob: 0406 996 300
Fax: 02 9942 9638


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Ole Jacobsen
Sent: Wednesday, 25 March 2009 9:41 AM
To: Dean Anderson
Cc: ietf-honest(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org; Fred Baker; 'IETF Discussion 
Mailing List'
Subject: Re: Subscriptions to "ietf-honest"

Dean,

The web interface is broken. I don't have the initial password and it
won't send me a new one.

Please cease and desist this nonsense and unsubscribe me promptly, I
never asked to be on your list, nor did anyone else that you added.

You're a spammer, plain and simple.

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj


On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Dean Anderson wrote:

The password was sent in the subscription mail. The mailing list
manager is GNU mailman, which is the same software many of the IETF
lists uses, including IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org(_dot_) List management is 
the same, and
the welcome message includes the password. In addition, mailman provides
a web interface, which can be found at:

List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.iadl.org/mailman/options/ietf-honest>,
<mailto:ietf-honest-request(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.iadl.org/pipermail/ietf-honest>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-honest(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org>
List-Help: 
<mailto:ietf-honest-request(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.iadl.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-honest>,
<mailto:ietf-honest-request(_at_)lists(_dot_)iadl(_dot_)org?subject=subscribe>

RFC2369 headers are included in each list message.

Logs show that Ole Jacobsen was added on February 28, 2009, after a post
to the IETF list.

--Dean



On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

I think he added the ietf list as a whole. When I tried to
unsubscribe it said I needed a password which it never sent,
so I assume I am not "on" his list the strict sense.

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj


On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Fred Baker wrote:

well, question. Did he actually do that, or did he make a mailing list 
that
has one member - the IETF list - to which he can add other members as he
chooses?

You may recall that at some point in the past we had the opposite. 
Someone set
up a mailing list that was subscribed to ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org and 
filtered some of
our more interesting personalities. Folks that subscribed to it go a 
feed
without the comments of (or replies to) those individuals. Many moved 
their
subscriptions.

Are you asking the Trust, or the IETF leadership, to send a cease and 
desist
letter?

On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:

I was auto-subscribed to Dean's "ietf-honest" mailing
list, and I'm unhappy about it. I don't know what his
current status is with regard to the ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
mailing list but I think he's pretty clearly abusing
this mailing list by snagging names from it and
putting us on his mailing list without asking. I'm also
not thrilled that the "welcome" message he sends out
fails to clearly identify who's sending it and that
he does not represent the IETF. This is a small problem
but a problem nonetheless.

Melinda
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000 



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
**********************************************************************
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/attachments/20090324/d6bbfe3f/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:12:10 -0700
From: SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net>
Subject: Re: IPR/Copyright
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Message-ID: 
<6(_dot_)2(_dot_)5(_dot_)6(_dot_)2(_dot_)20090324165738(_dot_)031580b8(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 16:35 24-03-2009, John C Klensin wrote:
I just attended the IPR ("Pre-5398 Problem") BOF and want to
share an impression and suggestion.

While one could debate details of text and procedures endlessly,
reopen old battles, etc., there is really only one issue at
this point, and that issue is whether the community wants to

* try to accelerate the transition toward 5378 by
obligating authors to make a serious attempt to get
signoff from previous contributors or

* treat documents that contain pre-5398 material as
provided for in the workaround, i.e., authors obtain all
of the rights if they are willing to do that but
otherwise just insert the workaround text and move on.

That would be the "minimum solution". It does not require authors 
to act as lawyers, hire lawyers, or perform a risk assessment to 
figure out what they need to do.

I note that, if the community's preference is really the second
choice, then we are finished. The Trustees would presumably
follow the general rough consensus on this list, interpret the
existing workaround as permanent, and we would all move on.

There is no pressing copyright problem to solve as there is the 
existing workaround. Unless there is a compelling reason for the 
first choice, I don't see a need to spend more time on this issue.

Regards,
-sm 



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:06:01 +0200
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s(_at_)rad(_dot_)com>
Subject: request for community assistance regarding TICTOC
requirements
To: "ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Message-ID:
<424CDC689E5CEF4D9FEADE56A378D92202181B2FD5(_at_)exrad4(_dot_)ad(_dot_)rad(_dot_)co(_dot_)il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi all,

The TICTOC WG is finalizing the scope of its requirements draft.

As of now the draft has information regarding the timing requirements for
- Cellular Backhauling
- Circuit Emulation
- Test and Measurement
- ToD over the general Internet
we have still unintegrated information for
- Sensor networks
- Legal uses of time
- Industrial Automation
and we have removed two applications for lack of interest or feasibility
- Remote Telco
- Electric power distribution.

We are still soliciting help in gathering requirements information for
- Uses of precise time in networking
- Metrology
If anyone can help in these latter applications, please contact the TICTOC 
chairs.
If no interest is expressed, we intend removing these applications from the 
list
of applications being considered.

In addition, if someone feels we missed an application that requires
distribution of timing information, it is possibly not too late to consider 
its inclusion.

Thanks

Y(J)S


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/attachments/20090325/286fb03a/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


End of Ietf Digest, Vol 10, Issue 76
************************************

_________________________________________________________________
Inédit ! Des Emoticônes Déjantées! Installez les dans votre Messenger ! 
http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/Emoticones/EmoticonesDejantees.aspx
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 10, Issue 76, aziz temmar <=