I don't whether simply "I approve" qualifies as a "substantive"
comment; that said, I have NO objections with the document
as it stands or in Camellia being used in OpenPGP in general.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:11 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the An Open Specification for Pretty
Good Privacy WG (openpgp) to consider the following document:
- 'The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP '
<draft-ietf-openpgp-camellia-04.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2009-04-23. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case,
please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-openpgp-camellia-04.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=16578&rfc_flag=0
The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf