On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:07:10 -0700
SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net> wrote:
As the draft was not approved by the IESG as a "Proposed Standard",
the fact is that most people in the IETF community would not consider
it as a proposed standard.
"The "Experimental" designation typically denotes a specification
that is part of some research or development effort. Such a
specification is published for the general information of the
Internet technical community and as an archival record of the work,
subject only to editorial considerations and to verification that
there has been adequate coordination with the standards process."
Publication as an "Experimental" RFC does make a document a
standard. The "Status of This Memo" which is prominently displayed
on the first page of the RFC mentions that:
"This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind."
Put another way, an Experimental RFC is no more an IETF standard than a
conference or journal publication. Someone has done something that is
perceived to be of enough interest to the community to publish as an
RFC, but it is manifestly *not* an IETF standard of any kind.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf