Simon, Thank you for your message.
... is there any particular reason why IETF Trust documents aren't written
using the excellent xml2rfc tool?
Actually ... no.
This is a good suggestion.
Best Regards,
Ed
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Simon Josefsson
<simon(_at_)josefsson(_dot_)org>wrote:
Ed Juskevicius <edj(_dot_)etc(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
FYI, a well-written new FAQ has just been posted to the IETF Trust
website.
Thank you!
This may sound as nit-picking, but is there any particular reason why
IETF Trust documents aren't written using the excellent xml2rfc tool? I
find the output from xml2rfc is more readable.
These documents could also be submitted as proper I-D's, to provide
better archival, searching, and cross-referencing of the documents.
/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf