On Mar 7, 2009, at 1:45 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
So, I'm not against another re-organization, but, in this time,
PLEASE:
- plan it well (think of all consequences for both I-Ds and RFCs)
- make the requirements precise and actually implementable
(remember: "must be on page 1" :-)
- give the tool developers sufficient time; optimally let *then*
decide when the cutover date should be
BR, Julian
+1
Also, There are some changes the IESG needs to deal with, some the
IAB, some the Trustees. We should incorporate all of this into one
single document that shows clear examples of what things will look
like so there is no confusion, then get all required approval bodies
to approve it. Having half the changes in one doc, half in another doc
results in unintended nightmares when we go to merge. I also propose
we do our best to get it right once instead of a steady stream of
changing requirements on document authors.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf