Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance Management Board: Why?
2009-03-01 13:55:44
Hannes,
Let me as a member of ISOC BoT that is appointed by the IETF explain a
bit more on what Lucy just explained below. I hope first of all that
you specifically noted that ISOC is looking for coordination with many
groups. This implies that when you or anyone else see some formal
connection between ISOC and other organisations does not imply ISOC
can get arrangements with other organisations as well. And, different
organisations require different kinds of "connections".
Regarding the work between IETF and ISOC in for example the work on
trust, that *is* done together with the IETF. We do not have any
formal explicit relationship with the various wg's (but the IETF as
you know does not work that way...), but we do of course have
connection with various very active IETF participants in the various
areas. You can for example have a look at the report that was
published in 2008 regarding specifically this work:
http://www.isoc.org/isoc/mission/initiative/docs/trust-report-2008.pdf
Attendees
ISOC Board of Trustees/Officers:
Fred Baker, Scott Bradner (remote), Hiroshi Esaki, Patrik Fältström,
Ted Hardie, Daniel Karrenberg, Franck Martin, Desirée Miloshevic,
Alejandro Pisanty (remote), Glenn Ricart, Stephen Squires (past BoT
member and instigator), Lynn St. Amour, Bill St. Arnaud, Patrick
Vande Walle ISOC Staff: Leslie Daigle (remote), Frederic Donck, Lucy
Lynch, Karen Rose
Internet Technical Community Representatives:
Russ Housley (Internet Engineering Task Force chair), Olaf Kolkmann
(Internet Architecture Board chair), Danny McPherson (Internet
Architecture Board)
Subject Experts:
Levi Gundert (Team Cymru), Dick Hardt (Sxip Identity), RL “Bob”
Morgan (Internet 2, University of Washington), Mikko Särelä (Nomadic-
Lab)
Work has continued after this workshop as Lucy explain, and many
individuals are involved in identity work in the IETF (including
Kerberos work) have been and are involved. They for example include
Leif Johansson that is a long time IETF participant. The whole goal
with this project is to coordinate, and explain "what's up".
But, I also see that you seem to be interested in helping, and I thank
you for that. ;-)
Patrik
On 1 mar 2009, at 18.59, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
As you might have noticed, the WebSSO Identity Management space is not
running out of organizations and groups. Someone could, for example,
come up
with the question why ISOC did not join the MIT Kerberos Consortium
(see
http://www.kerberos.org/), as Kerberos is a technology developed
within the
IETF, or to support technologies like OpenID, OAuth, etc. that are
closer to
the Internet deployment.
I am sure your team had a lot of conversations with the IAB on what
direction would be better for the Internet (with respect to the
creation of
an identity layer) but I fear that many in the IETF community are at
best
not informed about what you are doing and why you believe that this is
heading into the right direction.
If ISOC wants to understand what "managed identity" will mean for
end users
then maybe a discussion within the IETF would help to get a better
understanding as some of us have been working on this subject for a
while.
One could even claim that the IETF is also a pretty open forum to
discuss
these types of things, particularly when they have a high relevance
for the
Internet. Did nobody come up with the idea about how the IETF could
be more
actively involved in this space?
Ciao
Hannes
-----Original Message-----
From: Lucy Lynch [mailto:llynch(_at_)civil-tongue(_dot_)net]
Sent: 01 March, 2009 19:30
To: Hannes Tschofenig
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Internet Society joins Liberty Alliance
Management Board: Why?
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
I would like to hear a bit more background about these
activities, see
https://www.projectliberty.org/news_events/press_releases/
internet_soc
iety_j oins_liberty_alliance_management_board
Hannes -
<ISOC hat on>
As stated in the press release, ISOC has joined the the
Liberty Alliance Board. Our participation here is directly
related to the ISOC initiative on Trust and Identity (T/Id).
Our primary interest is not just the Liberty Alliance itself
but a proposed transition to a broader organization. This
effort is currently called either IDTBD or NewOrg in the
community discussions. The intent is to open participation to
new entrants and technologies and NewOrg will also help
represent emerging identity management work to end-users,
policymakers, enterprise adopters, and others.
ISOC has been actively reaching out to many of the current
identity technology communities as part of our effort to
understand what "managed identity" will mean for end users. We
also have some interest in how the frameworks and use cases
developing in user managed identity communities may overlap
and inform more traditional networked identity/identifier
problems. I believe that ISOC support for this move to an open
community lead forum will help bring this important work to a
broader audience and will encourage greater participation and
interoperability (high priorities for T/Id work:
http://www.isoc.org/isoc/mission/initiative/trust.shtml).
The transition to a "NewOrg" is still in process, and the founding
documents: by-laws, operating procedures, IPR considerations,
etc., were reviewed at the recent Liberty Alliance Plenary and
continue to progress.
(see: http://groups.google.com/group/idtbd)
- Lucy
Thanks!
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|
|