I believe the hum was about "lobbying" behavior of the candidates on
the open list toward NomCom and the rest of the community.
Russ
At 12:38 PM 4/1/2009, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Russ,
I may have misunderstood (I was presenting, so not taking good notes
during the NomCom discussions), but I'm looking at
Russ asks who believes that we need to do anything that
describes what is acceptable NomCom behaviour.
many hums
Russ asks who doesn't believe this is necessary?
a few more hums
and remembering that this part of the conversation was about
behavior beyond the NomCom (lobbying, etc) - behavior of nominees,
behavior of people who have opinions about the people on the nominee list, etc.
This was certainly my understanding from Leslie's post on
"openlist", on the NomCom mailing list.
Should I go listen to the audio?
Thanks,
Spencer
Several changes to the NomCom process were discussed during the plenary
session last Wednesday. The minutes have been posted so that anyone that
was not at the plenary session can catch up. The minutes can be found
here:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/minutes/plenaryw.txt
The discussion will continue on the ietf-nomcom(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mail list.
Thanks,
Russ
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf