On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Francis Dupont wrote:
=> this was and is the rule but because of typewriters the rule was
suspended during the 20th century. Now typewriters are in museums
and current century is 21th. BTW accents can be necessary to avoid
some ambiguities (cf 2nd reference) so the rule (in this case :-) is
justified.
Please, if people are going to open that debate again, could you (1)
only do it if you've read all the relevant material in the idnabis
archives and (2) do it on the WG mailing list (idnabis), since that's
where the relevant discussions are going on?
I will not rehash the arguements about this here, but I urge people
who want to weigh in on this to think about the matching rules for "E"
and "e" in the DNS, and then think about what might happen if we also
need to accommodate E->é _and_ É->é. Thank you.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf