On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:10:55AM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
In general, registries welcome DNSSEC, no matter how secure it is,
as long as its complicated operation works as an excuse to increase
(or not to reduce) registration charge and registries' revenue.
That is a serious charge. I've seen no evidence that DNSSEC
represents a revenue opportunity for registries. On the contrary, so
far as I've seen, most registries are introducing it without any fee,
even though it represents a substantial additional operational cost.
(Indeed, some of us were at times under the impression that the
practical inability to charge anything in order to offset this
additional cost was one of the biggest barriers to DNSSEC deployment.)
What registries are you thinking of that are charging extra for DNSSEC
delegations (i.e. for accepting a DS record)?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf