I really think we want to stay away from any statement which implies
anything about the nominees views about anyone.
I do not think it is reasonable or practical to try to include
disclaimers in the list of nominees about eveyr misapprehension that
readers of the list may form.
We ought not be making any public statement about the nominees degree of
willingness to serve, degree of desire for change or stability, or any
other opinion about the nominee. We are simply letting folks know that
the nominee exists.
If we absolutely have to have a stronger disclaimer, I would think it
would need to be quite general, not specific about nominees opinions on
any one dimension. And certainly not a list of thing on which the
nominee is not expressing an opinion in public.
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
Stewart Bryant wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Something like: "This is the list of those
nominated (or self-nominated) for IESG positions. The
nominees have said that they're willing to serve if
selected, but there is no implication that they consider
the incumbent unsuited for re-appointment."
Presumably there would need to be a second list of
names with the text: "These nominees have said that
they're willing to serve because they think the
incumbent is unsuitable for re-appointment."
... or maybe this would be expresses as just a
second list of names.
Stewart
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf