Forwarded here at the request of one of the authors:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-klensin-iasa-policy-00.txt
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:10:32 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Organization: University of Auckland
To: John Klensin <klensin(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>, "Joel M. Halpern"
<jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com>
References: <20090824183001(_dot_)3410B3A6E59(_at_)core3(_dot_)amsl(_dot_)com>
I think I agree with this document; these are editorial
issues.
There's a sequence in section 2.1 starting with the words
"I think" that clearly needs rephrasing.
Section 3:
In both cases, it may be useful to think of the "bouncing back"
process as as an appeal from the IASA to the Stream, but an appeal
that is explicitly
This material appears to be duplicated just above, in slightly
different words.
5. Emergency Situations
Emergencies can and do (unfortunately) occur. It is understood that
in an emergency, steps will be taken, and remedies applied. The
general rule is that if the Trust acts on an emergency basis,
This surely applies to IASA as a whole, not just the Trust.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf