SM wrote:
...
Is it because the effort to standardize failed? (Did the Initiative
want to keep editorial control, and when they found out they couldn't
if it was standard, they took their ball and went home? Is this draft
That's an interesting question.
RFC 5013 has an Informative reference to RFC 2731.
...
I note that RFC 5013 has a reference to RFC 2731, but that reference
never is used in the prose.
...
This is a purely administrative RFC. It doesn't define any protocol or
format. It just says: "look somewhere else for up-to-date versions".
That really does not require Security Considerations.
You could say something along those lines in the Security Considerations
section.
...
Agreed.
BR, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf