Unless you have stringent NAT policies (e.g. multi Firewalls that require it
outside your Enterprise), then there is no shortage of IP space in v6.
What is your primary concern?
AJ Jaghori
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <
mail(_at_)sabahattin-gucukoglu(_dot_)com> wrote:
Not in the IPv6 address space, anyway. And if it is, there's something
wrong and we should put it right.
Just been reading IAB's commentary on IPv6 NAT. It seems to me that we are
perpetuating the worst technology in existence *simply* for one feature,
network mobility, that is better served by proposing new techniques and
technologies and, in particular: we need a simple way to express host
relationships inside an organisation that is independent of external homing.
I refuse to suffer because of NAT any longer and don't want to accommodate
those that prefer it. If IPv6 does ever get wide enough deployment, and I
truly hope it does, I might just *give up* things to accommodate the
trouble-free life that is no NAT.
What do we have right now, first?
Cheers,
Sabahattin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf