ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard

2009-11-30 23:53:10
Paragraph 3 of section 4 says:

   Because this cipher suite is equivalent to an empty
   "renegotiation_info" extension, only renegotiation_info" may be used
   rehandshakes.

Leaving aside the incorrect punctuation, this doesn't make any sense to me.


In section 5, suggest replacing all occurrences of the word "draft" with the
word "specification".


In section 6.2, s/NOT allow clients who do not offer the
"renegotiation_info" extension/NOT allow clients which do not offer the
"renegotiation_info" extension/.





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>