IETF Discussion (thread)
Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard,
Tony Hansen,
2009/11/25
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, ned+ietf, 2009/11/25
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/25
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, SM, 2009/11/26
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2009/11/26
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard, Julien ÉLIE, 2009/11/30
Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures,
Andrew Allen,
2009/11/19
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Randy Presuhn, 2009/11/19
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/20
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, John Levine, 2009/11/20
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Andrew G. Malis, 2009/11/20
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, John R. Levine, 2009/11/20
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Robert Elz, 2009/11/23
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, John R. Levine, 2009/11/23
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Robert Elz, 2009/11/23
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Michael Dillon, 2009/11/26
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Lars Eggert, 2009/11/20
- RE: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Eran Hammer-Lahav, 2009/11/20
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures, Andrew G. Malis, 2009/11/20
RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules),
Cullen Jennings,
2009/11/18
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/18
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), John C Klensin, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), ned+ietf, 2009/11/19
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), John-Luc Bakker, 2009/11/19
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Russ Housley, 2009/11/20
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Thierry Moreau, 2009/11/22
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Dave Cridland, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Brim, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Steven M. Bellovin, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/28
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Thierry Moreau, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Lawrence, 2009/11/30
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Glen Zorn, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Brim, 2009/11/30
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Alexey Melnikov, 2009/11/27
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/27
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Alexey Melnikov, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Scott Lawrence, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Stephan Wenger, 2009/11/19
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Dan Wing, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules), Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2009/11/24
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), tytso, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Stephan Wenger, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/23
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules), John Levine, 2009/11/20
RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules),
Cullen Jennings,
2009/11/18
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Alexey Melnikov, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Michael Montemurro, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), tytso, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Randy Presuhn, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Fred Baker, 2009/11/19
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Andrew G. Malis, 2009/11/20
- RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Contreras, Jorge, 2009/11/20
- RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Contreras, Jorge, 2009/11/20
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules), Fred Baker, 2009/11/20
Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt,
Brian E Carpenter,
2009/11/17
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt, Paul Hoffman, 2009/11/18
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/23
- Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/24
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, RFC Editor, 2009/11/24
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Alice Hagens, 2009/11/30
- RE: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Jim Schaad, 2009/11/30
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/25
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Bob Braden, 2009/11/26
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/26
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/28
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/24
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt, Alfred Hönes, 2009/11/30
Logging the source port?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer,
2009/11/13
- Re: Logging the source port?, Joel Jaeggli, 2009/11/13
- Re: Logging the source port?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2009/11/13
- Re: Logging the source port?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/13
- Re: Logging the source port?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2009/11/15
- Re: Logging the source port?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/16
- Re: Logging the source port?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/23
- Re: Logging the source port?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/17
- Re: Logging the source port?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/23
- Re: Logging the source port?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2009/11/15
- Re: Logging the source port?, Richard Barnes, 2009/11/13
Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt,
Brian E Carpenter,
2009/11/11
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Roy T. Fielding, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Roy T. Fielding, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, David Morris, 2009/11/13
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/23
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, John C Klensin, 2009/11/15
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Roy T. Fielding, 2009/11/15
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Eliot Lear, 2009/11/16
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, John C Klensin, 2009/11/16
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/17
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, John C Klensin, 2009/11/17
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/17
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/17
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Roy T. Fielding, 2009/11/17
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/18
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Julian Reschke, 2009/11/26
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/28
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/23
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Lisa Dusseault, 2009/11/25
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt, Eliot Lear, 2009/11/13
IETF Plenary Discussions,
Danny McPherson,
2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Stephan Wenger, 2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Russ Housley, 2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Jari Arkko, 2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Tony Hansen, 2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Spencer Dawkins, 2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Harald Alvestrand, 2009/11/16
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Bob Hinden, 2009/11/16
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/16
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Melinda Shore, 2009/11/16
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Danny McPherson, 2009/11/16
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Eliot Lear, 2009/11/17
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/17
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Lisa Dusseault, 2009/11/17
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Scott Brim, 2009/11/11
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Lars Eggert, 2009/11/13
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Eric Rescorla, 2009/11/13
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions, Olaf Kolkman, 2009/11/12
- Jabber, ... at IETF Plenary Discussions (Re: IETF Plenary Discussions), "Martin J. Dürst", 2009/11/13
If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...,
Brian E Carpenter,
2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Richard Barnes, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Adrian Farrel, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Eliot Lear, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., John, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Spencer Dawkins, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Tony Hansen, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Andrew Sullivan, 2009/11/12
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/12
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., John C Klensin, 2009/11/17
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Doug Barton, 2009/11/17
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Loa Andersson, 2009/11/11
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/11
- publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Tony Hansen, 2009/11/11
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Carsten Bormann, 2009/11/11
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Tony Hansen, 2009/11/11
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, John C Klensin, 2009/11/12
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, James M. Polk, 2009/11/11
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Tony Hansen, 2009/11/11
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Alexey Melnikov, 2009/11/12
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Eliot Lear, 2009/11/12
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Donald Eastlake, 2009/11/12
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Tony Hansen, 2009/11/12
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Eliot Lear, 2009/11/12
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, "Martin J. Dürst", 2009/11/13
- Re: publishing some standards immediately at Draft-Standard status?, Dave Cridland, 2009/11/13
- RE: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Dan Wing, 2009/11/16
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious..., Cullen Jennings, 2009/11/24
Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before,
Stanislav Shalunov,
2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, John C Klensin, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technicalplenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Randy Presuhn, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Stanislav Shalunov, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Fred Baker, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Michael Richardson, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Andrew G. Malis, 2009/11/11
- RE: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Dan Wing, 2009/11/16
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Scott Brim, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Brian E Carpenter, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Scott Brim, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Marshall Eubanks, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Andrew Sullivan, 2009/11/11
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Marshall Eubanks, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Fred Baker, 2009/11/10
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before, Pekka Savola, 2009/11/11
RE: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security,
Mikael Abrahamsson,
2009/11/09
- Re: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Eric Levy-Abegnoli, 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Antonio Querubin, 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Dunn, Jeffrey H., 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Wes Beebee (wbeebee), 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Dunn, Jeffrey H., 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Hemant Singh (shemant), 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Dunn, Jeffrey H., 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Hemant Singh (shemant), 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Dunn, Jeffrey H., 2009/11/09
- RE: Fwd: Broadband Forum liaison to IETF on IPv6 security, Hemant Singh (shemant), 2009/11/09
Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy,
Christian Vogt,
2009/11/04
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Sam Hartman, 2009/11/04
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Masataka Ohta, 2009/11/05
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Christian Vogt, 2009/11/07
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Masataka Ohta, 2009/11/07
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Christian Vogt, 2009/11/07
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Masataka Ohta, 2009/11/09
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Christian Vogt, 2009/11/09
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Masataka Ohta, 2009/11/10
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/09
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Mark Andrews, 2009/11/09
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 2009/11/09
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/11
- Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Noel Chiappa, 2009/11/05
Re: Circle of Fifths,
joel jaeggli,
2009/11/02
- Re: Circle of Fifths, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/05
- Re: Circle of Fifths, John Levine, 2009/11/05
- Re: Circle of Fifths, Steve Crocker, 2009/11/05
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, John R. Levine, 2009/11/05
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Steve Crocker, 2009/11/06
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Bill Manning, 2009/11/07
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/09
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, David Conrad, 2009/11/09
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Dave CROCKER, 2009/11/09
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Peter Saint-Andre, 2009/11/09
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Bill Manning, 2009/11/13
- Re: our pals at ICANN, was Circle of Fifths, Mark Andrews, 2009/11/09
- Re: Circle of Fifths, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/09
- Re: Circle of Fifths, Steve Crocker, 2009/11/06
- Re: Circle of Fifths, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 2009/11/09