Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy

> > > > > "Phillip" == Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
    Phillip> I am not sure I want failover to be handled at the IP
    Phillip> transport level.  Failover is something I would see as
    Phillip> part of 'robust service connectivity' which would include
    Phillip> what to do if one or both endpoint hosts failed. 

I think I agree.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf