ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy

2009-11-09 23:28:59
from [Christian Vogt] [Permanent Link] 

On Nov 9, 2009, Masataka Ohta wrote:


Anyway, checksum of ICMP error generated against ICMP echo must
still be changed, and the error packet may (though does not usually
have to) be fragmented.


Sure, applications that use address referrals don't work well through
NAT; we mentioned this earlier.  ICMP is one of these "applications".

- Christian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
Next by Date:  Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-mpls-and-gmpls-security-framework (Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks) to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola
Previous by Thread:  Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Masataka Ohta
Next by Thread:  Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy, Masataka Ohta
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]