ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NAT Not Needed To Make Renumbering Easy

2009-11-10 19:52:23
Christian Vogt wrote:

Anyway, checksum of ICMP error generated against ICMP echo must
still be changed, and the error packet may (though does not usually
have to) be fragmented.

Sure, applications that use address referrals don't work well through
NAT; we mentioned this earlier.  ICMP is one of these "applications".

You miss the point.

People expect NAT support ICMP. But, NAT for ICMPv6 does not need
state, unless it is ICMP error against ICMP echo, contains large
routing header, is fragmented and the first fragment does not
contain checksum.

It is an example of how IPv6 was bloated to have many useless
features ignoring corner cases of interactions of the features.

                                                Masataka Ohta


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf