Individuals taking a long time to talk either on the mike or responding
on the stage :-) is one problem.
At times I wonder if a bigger issue is how long certain topics are
discussed. I'm sorry but I just can't get excited about labeling of
standards track RFCs, or even about how to get early review from the
IESG on documents that advance. The issues are the same as they are for
all other documents. If we want early review, get the document to the
IESG and have us provide feedback in some documented manner.
I'm curious why we end up discussing this stuff in the administrative
plenaries. I do not believe we have run out of other things to discuss.
For instance, we could have talked about the direction of the v6
transition work in the face of an ever growing set of proposals only
slightly different from each other. Or how the IESG handled some BOFs,
or the controversies that we have in a number of working groups. Or how
the IETF should organize work around some emerging new topics.
Did we NOT discuss these topics because we had nothing to say, or
because we had been exhausted by the standards ladder discussion?
Jari
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf