james woodyatt writes:
If it could be published as standards-track, instead of informational,
*without* *any* *further* *delay*, that would be excellent. However,
I believe there is nothing to be gained for the Internet community by
any further delay in publishing this important document.
It should have been published years go, fergawdzakes. Faster, please.
It's not difficult to get a standards-track RFC out quickly from this
point. Unusual, yes, but not difficult. Mark Crispin did it in a week
or so for RFC 4315 (another basically sound document with severe but
superficial problems).
The document author/editor has to react to comments and fix issues
promptly. That's all there really is to it.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf